Tuesday 8 april 2014 2 08 /04 /Apr /2014 14:59

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

Not satisfied with its widespread surveillance of multiple countries globally in tandem with its additional and determinedly ongoing invasive and clandestine spying on billions of people across the world even when its activities were comprehensively and embarrassingly exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden, the United States still seems incapable or unwilling, or both, to rein in its infernal meddling in the affairs of other countries and their citizens.

 

Not even the excruciatingly devastating experience that it crushingly suffered in terms of the effective loss of its significant financial outlay along with the enormous blow to its much vaunted self-esteem and hubris, or the huge discomfiture occasioned by it relative to the utterly humiliating but all the same brilliant manner in which it was completely wrong footed and totally outmanoeuvred by Russia as regards its imperialist enterprise not simply through an illegitimate but also a murderously brutal, regime change, putsch to co-opt Ukraine and more crucially the Crimea with its vital and intensely yearned for control of the latter’s Black Sea and historic naval facilities into the orbit of the American Empire and that of the latter’s bully boys the NARSISSIES, thus causing the said USA and its ever obliging European stooges, when they became undone by Russia’s masterstroke, to both literally and figuratively throw their dummies out of their prams like the spoilt brats they are, seem to have dimmed for a solitary moment the United States insatiable appetite for and its compulsive obsession with infernally creating mischief, and invariably deadly mayhem with it, in other people’s countries.

 

With Ukraine minus the Crimea very much poised over a powder keg courtesy of the diehard Nazis and Fascists that the US and the EU have installed there and who predictably, as is their nature, are now fighting among themselves, leopards are totally incapable of changing their spots, the United States while stupidly and irrationally dousing more oil on this Ukrainian inferno can still find the time, finance and effort, it seems, to dangerously stoke yet another ongoing and completely ill-conceived conflagration of its own wilful and malicious choosing in Venezuela. But the story of this obsessive and out of control US bête noire doesn’t just stop there. Oh no!

 

For we also know from alternative news reports, which have been confirmed by the US State Department, that Washington is funding to the tune of millions of US dollars an alternative twitter scheme whose purpose, the State Department’s fresh faced floozy, Marie Harf, who looks as if she hasn’t yet been properly weaned off her mother’s milk, if such androids ever get breastfed that is, is to target domestic Cubans, giving them, she went on, the opportunity as well as the means to challenge through social media outlets and other public manipulated measures encouraged and financed by the United States, a US instigated and supported insurrection by elements within the local Cuban population that would, with financial incentives beneficial to themselves, be persuaded to undermine through US orchestrated violence and ultimately overthrow what she deemed to be an oppressive and undemocratic regime in Havana.

 

While at the same time enthusiastically support the introduction, national implementation and the immutable consolidation of democracy, albeit à la the United States own twisted concept and application she conveniently forgot to say of that word, on that Caribbean island that for almost 60 years and counting, and quite interestingly in her studiously overlooked factual analysis but nevertheless farfetched  interpretation of Cuban affairs, has systematically, continuously and frenziedly, a process that is still ongoing, borne the brunt of US sanctions, blockades, threats  and military interventions, yet in spite of all that and much more still manages to survive; proof positive that the only way to seriously incapacitate or defeat odious bullies is not to succumb to them but instead confront them at every turn.

 

And if ever there was a classic case of a big and powerful country picking on a smaller one this is it; but I guess this mere strip of a girl didn’t listen to her president’s recent speech in Brussels on this specific topic when he was quite asininely firing his incredibly hypocritical and accursed ultra sanctimonious barrage of insults, innuendos and accusations, all of them without exception totally unfounded and without a shred of evidence to corroborate what Barack Obama was saying  and whose venomous pronouncements on President Putin and the Russian Federation when looked at closely and objectively was in reality Barrack Obama gazing into the proverbial mirror, assiduously observing and reciting what he saw there and in effect consciously and dishonestly off-loading onto President Putin and the Russian people what was actually a compendium of historical and contemporary American crimes of consummate notoriety and the manifold execution of these.

 

Not for the first time, or would it be the last I imagine, that the rest of the world would be treated to such an exposition of manic psychosis, a false exhibition of concern for smaller nations, and even worst the invertibility of one’s wrongdoings onto others from a US President as is the common practice of the United, its EU and other white Caucasian satrapies and stooges. That said, I quite honestly don’t think that anyone in the US State Department bothers in the least to pay the slightest attention to anything coming out of the mouth, or any other orifice come to that, of Barack Obama much less do they either care to listen to or attach any significance at all to what he says; and principally so for two specific and quite obvious reasons, to any discerning individual that is.

 

The first of these is that the US State Department is endemically infested at the present time with fanatical and recidivistic Nazi-Neocons and diehard, intractable fascists. Nothing out of the ordinary, it must be stressed, for this pivotal, US foreign policy and decision-making department of state that by its nature and from its very inception has had an intrinsically cultivated and quite pronounced Nazi inclination, culture, ideology and orientation.

 

A prime example of what I mean, and which is just the mere tip of the iceberg of other manifold and equally odious activities on the part of the US States Department, is that US Secretary of State, Cordell Hull who held that office at the US State Department prior to an intransigently unwilling United States to get involved in World War II, which it saw as Europe’s war and consequently had nothing whatsoever to do with the United States that anyway was making a king’s ransom, backed by overwhelming support on the part of the US public for Nazi Germany, by selling state of the art weaponry to Germany along with the Zyklon B gas that the Nazis across Europe used in their death camps to eradicate Jews, Gypsies and other so-called “Untermenschen” – “Undesirables” to those who aren’t familiar with German – until the United States was bounced into the war it tried its utmost to avoid by Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbour.

 

Secretary of State Cordell Hull, who held on to his portfolio at the US State Department after the United States’ belated entry into World War II - a war in which it can’t be stressed enough some 20 million Russians heroically and selflessly sacrificed their lives to help in the ultimate defeat of Nazism and fascism in Europe - and carried on doing so throughout World War II, notwithstanding his position and the crucial responsibility that it entailed, nevertheless consciously developed a damning notoriety, which he exultantly savoured, for resolutely refusing permission to ships that had sailed from Europe to the United States with Jewish and other European refugees on board and whose sole endeavour among these passengers was to seek sanctuary in the US having fled Nazi persecution and tyranny back home from docking in any US harbour; and that included those of the US’ Caribbean colony of Puerto Rico.

 

With other countries in the region of the United States very much under the US’s thumb and taking their lead directly from that country together with a similar reluctance on the part of Britain to take them in, these refugees were presented with the only choice open to them, and that was to be sent back to the countries from whence they came. And this is precisely what happened to those who didn’t have the courage to take their own lives; but even so they too didn’t have long to live, since without exception they quickly on arrival back home summarily ended up in the gas chambers and other death camps dotted around mainland Europe. And in one of the most cynical and ironical acts imaginable to anyone with a conscience Secretary of State Cordell Hull was awarded at the war’s end with the Nobel Peace Prize. This despite him and US intelligence officials having known from the outset about the mass killings of Jews and other supposed “Untermenschen” in Nazi Germany yet failed to acknowledge Hitler’s campaign in this regard.

 

The second major reason, and a quite significant one too in the circumstances, why the US State Department is behaving as it does is because the serving President of the United States of America is a weak president, and those in the State Department as is everyone else globally who is neither brain dead, brainwashed nor isn’t living in some kind of a parallel universe of their own creation and distinct from the rest of us knows that too. The psychological problems associated with the progeny of mixed race, black and Caucasian unions where the father is black and the mother white are legion and well-documented; and these are invariably compounded when it’s the white mother or her family who are the ones that exclusively raise and bring up that child in a sole and often illiberal and even racist Caucasian environment with no input of any kind ever sought, encouraged or allowed from that child’s black relatives or cultural heritage.

 

Barrack Obama may have married an African-American woman whose ancestral heritage is one of slavery, colonialism, Jim Crow Laws, segregation, lynching and all the rest of it, and although his father was a black Kenyan and whose country and people were similarly subjected under British colonial rule to the same universal and collective, white Caucasian barbarities that were routinely systematically and ongoingly inflicted on Black people worldwide for in excess of 500 years since the introduction of the Transatlantic Slave Trade and are still going on in a multiplicity of ways, Barack cannot honestly be said to truly understand, appreciate or fully empathize with what he’s never experienced or been told about from firsthand knowledge.

 

As a result Barrack can more readily empathize and identify with the Irish, a direct consequence of his nebulous Irish roots that an Irish researcher in Ireland unearthed it’s claimed in 2007 and which Barack sometime afterwards knew about for the very first time; a somewhat curious revelation that neither Barrack’s late white American mother nor his similarly late white American grandmother, who incidentally raised him, seemed to have known absolutely nothing about, than he ever could or would personally want to with black Kenyans or your average black American for that matter. Just honestly ask yourself, how many state or even informal presidential visits has this biological son of Kenya made to that country, a big fat ZERO, and contrast that with the proud manner and what previous white Caucasian US presidents have done when it came to recognizing their white European heritage and racial lineage? All of these earmarked with visits to their ancestral lands; and even the terrorist activities in places like Ireland didn’t put them off from going there. Yet we have the first non-white US president eschewing Kenya, the land of his father and generations of his people, like the plague. I leave you to draw your own conclusions.

 

Therefore the manifold travesties of justice, the traumas, the humiliations, the massive wrongful and disproportionate imprisonment of US Blacks of both genders, their overwhelming numbers on death row disproportionate too to the percentage of black people that comprise just one element of the US population and compounded by the burgeoning numbers of Blacks racially killed by whites who then simply walked free courtesy of an institutionalized racist, US so-called judicial system – the murder of Trayvon Martin is one such example -  that has no qualms convicting and sentencing Blacks to death if they’re accused of killing whites, even when the facts are scanty or non-existent, are issues that don’t touch Barack Obama and that he evidently either doesn’t care about or want to concern himself with.

 

Every white President of the United States of America has looked after the interests of his race and it’s a fair bet that if whites were being treated in the US as Blacks historically have been and still are a white US president, regardless, of his political ideology or party allegiance, would move hell and high water irrespective of what it takes to rectify these injustices that his people were unfairly and inhumanely being subjected to. Not so Barack Obama! For while having relied on over 95% of the Black US electorate to vote him into office twice President Barrack Obama hasn’t done any of the aforementioned in relation to Black people in the US or the wider Black Diaspora and frankly doesn’t want to. Yet rather insultingly to all of us with black ancestry, I must confess, instinctively becomes the military Superman, diplomatic Defender and financial Benefactor prepared to take on a nuclear armed Russian Federation to ludicrously protect the alleged rights of all people the Nazi and Fascist descendants of Stepan Bandera; and with not a solitary Nigger in sight in that Eastern European cesspit of white Caucasians; for there are none of them living there!

 

White Caucasians can be barbaric and the more barbaric that they are the more canny they appear to be, and it’s a truism that once such people are allowed to get the upper hand they never let go of it. The US State Department is replete with barbarians of the most odious and loathsome kind and whose barbarism, to put it mildly, is infinite. Furthermore, these contemporary Neanderthals know perfectly well that they have Barrack by the short and curlies, not least because they’re very much aware, and use this knowledge exploitatively, how keen Barack Obama: the first departure in US political history away from a white male Caucasian president, wants to be seen, treated and most importantly to be fully accepted as what he inwardly considers himself to be: a white man. What conscionable Blacks in such circumstances observing such troubled members of their race regard as “COCONUTS”: persons who’re brown on the exterior but white on the inside! A phenomenon not at all dissimilar to a black woman marrying a white Caucasian male not out of love necessarily but to breed out her blackness and ensure that her descendants end up white. Such is the traumatic and profound psychological scarring of elements still within the Black Diaspora as a consequence of centuries of the most inhumane treatment meted out to them at the hands of white Caucasians.

 

All that temporarily aside however and with the US State Department having decidedly gone rogue, here we have it unilaterally and rather coercively pushing a social media vehicle down the throats of Cubans on the subjective premise that social media is good for democracy; well their version of it anyway. Yet we don’t hear a solitary tweet, or are we ever likely to, out of the same US State Department when false flag enthusiasts like the NARSSISIES Pact and Turkey’s idiotic prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan - I wonder where he got his ideas from - brutally cracks down on the real TWITTER to painstakingly throttle democracy in his own country which is a close military ally of the United States. Talk about double standards! And quite recently too we saw Barack Obama paying a state visit to BANTU SAUDI: you know the one; that paragon of democracy and human rights. No US or other western twitter-based or other social media campaigns there, but that said why would they be needed in this bastion of DEMOCRCY, I don’t think. So my advice to this feckless floozy, like all of her kind at the US State Department, is grow up; fact check your material and stop treating everyone like the purblind morons that the lot of you are.

 

The governments of Venezuela ever since the emergence of the late Hugo Chavez have been faultlessly democratic; and if the people of Cuba wanted to overthrow the system of government there they would have done so within the last almost 60 years. But they haven’t. And you know why? Because they have a deep and unconquerable pride in themselves and what their government is doing for them. Cuba has a far better educational system than that of the United States, the UK and most European countries and its health service is second to none. Now compare that with the United States where some 47 million people are without health insurance and obviously any sort of healthcare, a figure that is existentially growing there; and even here in the UK where a principal medical officer has advised the British public to do its best not to get sick as they run the serious risk of dying if admitted to our average British NHS hospitals, which are starved of cash and chronically depleted of trained medical and support personnel, the situation to say the least is dire.

 

Apart from Barbados with a similar health record to that of Cuba no other country in the Caribbean or the Americas can boast this achievement. And while the United States and its willing European satrapies like Britain, France and Germany for example export enormous amounts of arms, other weaponry and chemical weapons that cause indescribable suffering, innumerable deaths, personal tragedies and chaos globally Cuba on the other hand exports doctors, other medical professionals and teachers. So who would you truthfully say, given these circumstances, was the more ethical of these two diametrically opposed entities; and what’s more who would you prefer and want to be on your side if you were in a medical predicament and your life was at stake?

 

Additionally like Barbados Cuba has the most centenarians per population than all of the so-called western industrialized nations, and Venezuela like both these Caribbean countries has under Hugo Chavez and his successor Nicolas Madura pulled the ordinary Venezuelan man, woman and child out of massive poverty that was endemic there because the country’s wealth was being foisted off to banks in the United States and Europe by the oligarchs that previously ruled the country and that capitalist USA and its allies would quite dearly love to see come back into power.

 

They won’t do so democratically that’s for sure, and it’s why the United States has had to resort to all manner of means to affect regime change in these countries; but the people aren’t stupid. They know what was there previously and don’t want to go back to those bad old and exploitative days; and rather than the United States and its stooges seeking to effectively destroy these countries and utilizing all sorts of outlandish means to do so, it would be much more beneficial both for US and European citizens if their governments did the same for them.

 

Fundamentally what the United States and its allies are doing is illegitimate, unjust and immoral. The existence of the NARSISSIES and their real purpose is to extend and support the American Empire enabling the latter to militarily flex its muscle and expand its wings globally. As such the NARSISSIES main anchor is the US and the Pentagon, for because of the United States perceived economic, political and military power it is able to shield itself from all legal culpability, otherwise many of its political leaders and military personnel would have speedily found themselves hauled before international courts charged with war crimes and crimes against humanity. So please MISS FRESH FACE FLOOZY at the US State Department I firmly suggest that you first fact check and do your homework next time before you take to opening your mouth and risibly pontificating on things that you know absolutely nothing about. And as you embark on doing that it would also be much appreciated by the genuine international community if you were to pass on the same advice to the rest of your US State Department colleagues.

 

And please also permit me to say one further thing before I finish Marie Harf, perhaps the US State Department could come clean and explain to the US taxpayers what has really happened to the six (6) billion US dollars supposedly earmarked for redevelopment in Iraq and Afghanistan but which has gone missing, some of which has quite apparently been stolen while other similarly significant sums have unlawfully been siphoned off to fund projects like the US State Department’s incredibly outlandish and evidently failed twitter-style programme aimed at destabilizing and fomenting a US instigated and sponsored insurrection campaign against the Cuban government and people.

 

My pertinent question to you Ms Harf is this: Don’t you clowns at the US State Department ever learn? Even young babies and active toddlers quickly tire of doing the same things and very soon become quite agitated if those things that they transparently eschew are foisted upon them by adults or others, and in the case of Cuba, consecutive United States administrations and especially the State Department have been jointly waging this rather ludicrous campaign of theirs for nigh on 60 years, far longer than you were born Marie Harf, to overthrow the government of that Caribbean island. Seriously and intelligently isn’t it time you all realize that the overwhelming majority of the Cuban people have been all this time and are still refusing to allow themselves to be duped by this crass US propaganda and its blatant destabilization techniques also orchestrated by the United States and simply give up? Intelligent people would have done so long ago, but do forgive me I temporally forgot myself; you’re the US State Department and such breed of people neither control it nor work there!

 

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 2 april 2014 3 02 /04 /Apr /2014 14:51

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

NATO: Narcissistic Arrogant Terroristic Oligarchical, the endemically racist, culturally myopic, overwhelmingly Caucasian even if you racially include the eastern half of Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s useful idiot Turkey; white supremacists; conspicuously outmoded, born again colonialist and comprehensively imperialist morons. Sadistic to the core like feral, immeasurably intellectually challenged and sociopathic individuals who derive their sick and perverse pleasure by needlessly inflicting pain and trauma on those whom they can comfortably bully and terrorize while getting hugely sexually turned on from doing so because that’s the only way these gender confused and largely cuckolded Caucasian imbeciles can publicly display their fanciful and predominantly non-existent alpha male credentials, knowing that their victims are either physically too small, militarily or economically weak or else without the kind of influential clout to significantly strike back, creating a situation that consequently enables these NATO aggressors to get away with their criminal and perfidious actions, not dissimilar from that of sickeningly pulling the wings off a live butterfly.

 

Come the 4th April 2014 NATO – henceforth, and most certainly from my perspective, to be known and also referred to as the “NARSISSIES”: sociopathic retards completely absorbed with and exclusively in love with themselves, full of illogical and contradictory bullshit, and as trustworthy and reliable in what they say and do as the public and lying pronouncements of consecutive US administrations, officials, their allies and collaborators deliberately giving the completely erroneous impression that the Guantanamo Bay hellhole and systematic torture gulag  they’ve collaboratively and collectively created is instead some kind of a state of the art upmarket health spa , while all the time masquerading as macho males but inwardly going to great lengths to conceal their embarrassing and perverted female propensities, will chalk up 65 years of a mostly useless, realistically unproductive, futile and self-aggrandizing existence that has created significantly more international catastrophes and globally related problems than it has actually solved or is ever likely to, and quite frankly has long outlived any usefulness that its creation initially ever envisioned; but like those around Ariel Sharon, the late, universally unlamented, Israeli mass murderer PM and diehard terrorist, those associated with the “NARSISSIES” just as asininely refuse to let this equally odious entity die a natural death.

 

In normal circumstances 65, certainly in the civilized world, is the age at which most adult and genuinely mature people retire from a previously active career or working life and thus devote their time to other enlightening and beneficial pursuits not only in their own interests but also those of others. The “NARSISSIES” haven’t done so however nor have they shown any willingness to, because with the identical entrenched mindset of serial paedophiles that obsess with and thoroughly enjoy preying on the utterly defenceless or the very vulnerable the “NARSISSIES” don’t see or appreciate any reason why they should.

 

So I shan’t be wishing the “NARSISSIES” happy birthday come the 4th April 2014, as they’re wholly unworthy of any such recognition from the likes of me or anyone else for that matter with a functional brain in his or her head. For in terms of promoting or securing global or even western stability let alone general peace the “NARSISSIES” have failed quite miserably and spectacularly in these explicit endeavours, which to be perfectly honest with you was never their real remit in the first place; and if you think otherwise you and they aren’t only welcome but most definitely belong to each other, and quite deservedly so!

 

The “NARSISSIES mission and principal objectives are and have always been to justify their own existence, to extensively expand and strengthen their political membership and additionally firmly reinforce their military capabilities. Other than that just honestly ask yourselves what realistically are the “NARSISSIES protecting Europe, or the rest of the world come to that, from? Russia? How absurd! Russian tanks aren’t about to roll through the streets of Paris for example as they wouldn’t be able to anyhow even if President Putin were so disposed to have them do so, which evidently he most certainly isn’t. And besides, such tanks in the ludicrous and fictional imagination of western leaders wouldn’t be able to get through the Paris traffic anyway. As anyone who knows Paris and is familiar with its customary traffic congestion already knows full well that the latter would quite significantly hamper and even preclude such an unlikely occurrence from ever happening.

 

And as if this western and the “NARSISSIES purblind paranoia vis-à-vis Europe, and particularly Eastern Europe, wasn’t bad enough what logically is the “NARSISSIES rationale for expanding with increasing and significant alacrity, against the stark backdrop of justified global alarm, their presence in Africa and most especially sub-Saharan Africa, except for the “NARSISSIES own institutional self-justification, an irrational persecution complex that is itself firmly combined with an innate control-freakism characteristic of this intrinsically militaristic-mindset, white Caucasian and rogue outfit.

 

Many of the “NARSISSIES hierarchy have exceedingly well paid jobs that because of the Cold War paradigm that these self-serving bastards outmodedly cling on to would instantly become defunct if their “NARSISSIES outfit accepted reality, admit that the Warsaw Pact was dissolved with the collapse of the Soviet Union and that the “NARSISSIES should have as they now must realistically go the same way. But these hierarchical hawks and their warmongering leaders don’t want this to happen anymore than those benefiting hugely from the amorphous war on drugs or terror want that these issues be resolved anytime soon either.

 

So rather than the “NARSISSIES policymakers simply accepting reality and sticking if they must to their body’s founding charter which is the mutual defence of member states, the “NARSISSIES have instead quite unilaterally and hubristically adopted an “out of area policy” which effectively means that they’ve arrogated to themselves the exclusive right to act and operate at will anywhere in the world that they choose to and specifically outside the designated North Atlantic region that was their original remit.

 

Between you and me though what has significantly put the noses of the United States, the EU and the other “NARSISSIES satrapies out of joint is the timely intervention of both the Russian and the Crimean people through having Crimea freely and in an overwhelming display of mutual solidarity democratically reunifying itself with Mother Russia. Actions that assiduously pulled the rug from under the feet of the United States that asininely imagined it could waltz into the Ukraine co-opt it into the “NARSISSIES, provocatively oust Russia from its centuries’ old Black Sea naval base there and as in Bahrain, where there’s no democracy or human rights of any kind, implant another US imperialistic navy to further the interests of the America Empire.

 

Just imagine what the United States, its European and other western satrapies instinctive response, and that includes that of the “NARSISSIES, would have been if the Russian Federation had dared to similarly and barefacedly seek to co-opt or seduce Puerto Rico in the same way that the US and its European stooges wanted to do with Crimea and with the identical mindset and idiotic intention in Russia’s case of inserting a Russian naval base thousands of miles away from Russia’s national borders within the unmistakably undisputed waters of this United States colony in the Caribbean as these full of themselves and absolutely pathetic western morons tried their utmost to do in the case Crimea. There would immediately have been an outbreak of World War III triggered by the United States and its spineless puppets irrespective of whether or not that Russian decision was a mutually consensual one between the people and government of Puerto Rico or had been forced on them by the Russian Federation. Either way Washington wouldn’t have given a damn and would have reacted in the same way regardless!

 

And it chalks up memories of the United States double standards when the world was on the brink of a thermo-nuclear war because the then Soviet Union in a lawful and mutual agreement between the Cuban government and itself decided to install nuclear missiles in Cuba, 90 miles away from the United States mainland, provoking the infuriated and self-righteous response from Washington notwithstanding the clear and undisputed fact that the United States and its “NARSISSIES” allies had themselves, and for some considerable time previously, installed their own nuclear missiles in Turkey which, wait for it, had a land border with the Soviet Union; which even the most dumbed down educational imbecile even if he or she takes even the most cursory look at a map of the globe can say exists in the case of the United States and Cuba, not then in 1962 and certainly not now!

 

So as I’ve said earlier, written elsewhere and repeat again the behaviour of so-called US and other western leaders is analogous to that of adults who haven’t acquired the capacity or don’t have the ability to grow up and mature into commonsensical individuals; who are pathetic and contradictory in the way they act; are downright selfish and narcissistic with it and have this asinine view that the only opinion that matters, right or wrong but invariably wrong, is their own.

 

And in my view Russia’s two finger salute wasn’t only applicable but also long overdue; so well done President Putin and the people of both the Crimea and the Russian Federation. And if in response to this laudable action the American Empire and its white Caucasian and European satrapies want to act like spoilt brats throwing their dummies out of their prams just because they can’t get their way, personally I couldn’t give a damn, nor would any other sensible person either!

 

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 26 march 2014 3 26 /03 /Mar /2014 15:00

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

How is it possible, and why is it permitted by the rest of the global community, for the world’s principal meddler in other peoples’ and their countries domestic affairs to pompously lecture others, and largely get away with it too, on what it has itself arrogantly, dishonestly and brutally been doing ever since its own turbulent inception as a fledgling state in 1776?

 

And how can the United States of America that has routinely, savagely and self-servingly toppled popular and democratic governments across the world, customarily replacing them with brutal dictatorships of its own choosing; that unilaterally foments coup d’états elsewhere globally thousands of miles away from its own borders and even the region where the USA is located risibly lecture others on their duty to respect the sovereign integrity of nations and the need to comply with and adhere to international law; concepts that the said USA picks and chooses to suit its own selfish whims and fancies and invariably perverts at every turn?

 

Moreover, what feasibility or credibility, come to that, can any prescient-minded or intelligent person attach, and why should they, to the hollow, insulting, downright narcissistic and bombastic pronouncements of a United States of America that not only criminally but also consistently flouts its own laws and the hallowed and enshrined tenets of its national Constitution while arrogating to itself the sole right to haughtily and uncompromisingly dictate to others how they should behave?

 

And who was it that imperiously coined the phrase “regime change”, which effectively means the literal and subjective dispensing by any means at the aggressor’s disposal, including the use of fraudulently trumped up charges relating to the alleged violation of domestic human rights, themselves commensurate with equally lying indictments of crimes against humanity principally directed against US targeted victim states and their chosen leaders and very often supplemented by US or NATO military attacks at the behest of the United States?

 

Actions perpetrated against those that these western entities decide to go after in order to liquidate perceived opponents of what the United States considers as its exclusive right to determine what the world order should be, and whose real crime from the perspective of US leaders, who gave the world this obnoxious term “regime change”, is that these targeted countries and their leaders dared to chart their own independent course, as is their right, and in doing so resolutely refused to toe the United States dictated and foreign policy line; decisions interpreted by the US, its EU and NATO stooges as threats that couldn’t be countenanced and therefore must militarily be removed to further facilitate the growing and overbearing presence of US imperialistic and global hegemony!

 

Looks to me, bearing all this and much more in mind, that rather than spending inordinate periods of time, effort and money that it can ill afford lambasting, vilifying, denouncing and whenever and wherever possible destroying those who consciously behave as all responsible and mature adults should, that the United States and its woefully uninformed citizenry together with its complicit and compliant crony NATO and EU satrapies would, as indeed the rest of the world, be best served if the United States and its plethora of obsequious, willing and useful idiots globally and particularly in Europe quite literally grow up; begin to emulate the behaviour of those world leaders who’re actually adult in their conduct, and stop being the downright exasperating, interfering, intolerant, sanctimonious and utterly dangerous pain in the ass that this unholy construct known as the west and led by the US quite asininely and evidently is.

 

For to have the US, EU and NATO loudly and recurrently pontificating about human rights and the rest of it is analogous to a vicious serial killer lecturing both the relatives of his victims and others as well on the sanctity of human life. It’s highly perverse and unless you’re testosterone-driven sociopaths like Victoria Nuland, Samantha Power, Jen Psaki and even Hillary Clinton; village idiots like John McCain, and other deranged nutters, past and present, within the US political establishment as well as our very own here in the UK, notably the entire Con-Dem government and its leadership in tandem with Ed Miliband and the born again Blairites in his shadow cabinet, makes no sense at all. Not to normal people anyway! Maybe what we do need in the UK right now is a Maidan-type putsch of the kind that these aforementioned UK bastards helped to illegitimately gain power in Ukraine.

 

And wouldn’t it be most interesting to see how our Zionist Jews and their Friends of Zionist apartheid Israel: the likes of David Cameron, Ed Miliband, who wouldn’t have been born in Britain if at all anywhere if his parents hadn’t fled the same odious Nazis and Fascist mass murderers and genociders that he’s now supporting in Ukraine, Boris Johnson and Malcolm Rifkin responded, knowing, as they should do, the pedigree of these descendants and disciples of Stepan Bandera. As I’ve said elsewhere we could do with some serious ethnic cleansing of the right sort with its attendant genocidal liquidation in the UK, and who better in the current circumstance than the successors of Stepan Bandera’s lot to do it.

 

After all, it was Clement Attlee’s post World War II Labour Government that at the behest of the United States let into Britain scores of thousands of these Ukrainian Waffen SS Nazi, death camp killers and ethnic genociders, Fascists and their families and they’re still living here in the form of their British born offspring, masquerading as the English Defence League (EDL); the sort of people, if one can call odious Nazi and Fascist scum that, that prized prats like the incumbent Community Secretary in David Cameron’s Con-Dem regime, Eric Pickles literally worships. So bring on the Maidan and their current leader Dmitry Yarosh I say and have the wheel turn full circle! After all that’s what the US and its European stooges, including our own parliamentary ones, wanted in Ukraine, so why not in the UK as well? Maybe these imperialist and duplicitous jerks should first have familiarized themselves with the maxim: “Beware what you wish for on others that you unwarrantably despise and plot harm against” before they criminally got involved themselves in the Ukraine.

 

Even within their own national borders democracy is routinely seen and firmly acknowledged by the west’s political and controlling elites as something they must and what’s more have the right to selfishly manipulate. And with this mindset assiduously adhered to it’s hardly surprising then that when it comes to dealing with local people and their leaders in other countries those who support this western point of view concomitant with the west’s foreign policy objectives, however undemocratic, immoral or even dictatorial this process is, are deemed by the west as democratic entities.

 

While those who don’t, regardless of how overwhelmingly transparent and truly democratic their openly expressed choices or decisions are, are denounced by the west as undemocratic, the same west that then initially threatens them demanding that they desist from their freely chosen, morally exemplary and impeccably independent course of action; and should they refuse to yield to such unreasonable behaviour and undisguised blackmail unhesitatingly in western political eyes become prime targets for western coercive and or military regime change.

 

Chicago has always been and still is one of the most violent and politically corrupt places in the United States, and where such places are not uncommon. Currently the former White House advisor to Barack Obama is Chicago’s incumbent mayor and Barack himself before his elevation to the presidency of the USA was the US senator for the state of Illinois of which Chicago is a constituent part. Refresh my memory if you care to but I don’t recall either of these two men doing a great deal, if anything at all, to rectify for the better the perilous situation in Chicago.

 

Yet both of them, and Barack Obama specifically in his role as President of the United States of America, have never had any disinclination nor difficulty, while studiously eschewing all critical comments or justified condemnations relative to Chicago itself and similar corrupt entities across the entire United States, in not only unwarrantably and publicly making completely subjective and uncorroborated condemnatory pronouncements on countries and their leaders that they don’t like – that’s shorthand for those countries and their leaders who implacably refuse to become part of the American Empire – but also vehemently set about dictating to them how they should conduct their own affairs.

 

A situation that would be analogous, if I were so obtuse but thankfully I’m not, to my standing in front of my open bedroom window on the top floor of my house, looking outside and seeing a male passerby using the quite legitimate public footpath that runs parallel to my home and the other neighbouring houses, imperiously and without any provocation whatsoever on this passersby part shout to him: “Don’t you dare step off that footpath and walk on my lawn!”; something that this guy wasn’t in the process of doing nor did his demeanour indicate that he ever had the slightest interest or intention of doing so.

 

But guess what? My subjective and arrogant dislike of this man who has never done me any harm and who I honestly don’t know nevertheless compels me to find out where he lives, to then go over to his house when he’s not there, discover that he has a wife, coercively through her evident fear of me sexually seduces her behind her husband’s back and what’s more quite impudently do so inside his own home; and when this man finally discovers what I’ve been doing to his wife and demands to know why, my conceited and hubristic response to him is, “Because I can bloody well do so and get away with it; and there’s bugger all that you can do to stop me!”

 

An accurate assessment of the United States and its western satrapies’ global attitudes and foreign policy agenda, wouldn’t you say? But the pertinent question is: “Are you entirely happy with this, and if not and especially to those of you living in the west what are you going to do about it?

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 19 march 2014 3 19 /03 /Mar /2014 14:49

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

David Cameron thinks the Crimean referendum is “a mockery of democracy.” Apart from reaching that conclusion because it’s not the result he wanted one is nevertheless bound to ask, listening to him say that, do the mouths of the likes of David Cameron ever engage with their brains, albeit limited in scope as they evidently are, before their imbecilic owners decide to speak?

 

In Britain we have an electoral system of first past the post which is anything but democratic. For not only is it routinely possible for the alleged winner in any electoral race to end up receiving less votes than the combined total of votes garnered by the other candidates, which means that even among those who bothered to vote the so-called winner not only doesn’t enjoy majority support but equally there hasn’t been in living memory either in UK parliamentary or local government elections anything that’s remotely in excess of 50% of eligible voters turning out to vote; so it can hardly be said that our MPs and local government councillors enjoy the majority support of the British electorate. Usually in general elections in the UK the voter turn out is around 33% and in local elections anything between 7% and 18 % of voters who bother to turn up to vote. So work out the maths for yourselves

 

Even the universally acknowledged mass murderer Tony Blair in his so-called landslide victory in 1997 got that alleged landslide on the back of just 33% of the British electorate turning out to vote and that figure was itself divided between the three main parties consisting of Blair’s New Labour Party, the Tories, Lib-Dems, other minority parties, and of course independent candidates. So where’s the democracy you’re vaunting so much here in the UK that wasn’t prevalent in Crimea’s case David Cameron, a situation where most of the UK’s electorate chooses not to vote rather than actually doing so?

 

And how ironic David that you’re the Prime Minister of our country yet no one voted for you to become that since your party, even under our skewed electoral system, didn’t get a majority of seats in the House of Commons and it was only through a carpetbagging deal with the minority Lib-Dems, as the Liberal Party that was, out of power for nearly a century, hungry for power and seizing the opportunity to be in government again, cobbled together a deal out of mutual avarice, expediency and self-interest with your Tory Party where you as leader of the Tories and Nick Clegg that of the Lib-Dems facilitated a situation where by virtue of they and your Tories combined having had more seats in the House of Commons than the rest of the shower that got elected there you became PM and in return  you made Nick Clegg your Deputy PM. Self-interest on both sides or what?

 

So please don’t from your sanctimonious high tower lecture anyone on either the concept or principles of democracy David, as it sure as hell isn’t practised within the UK’s electoral system; nor in the US or Canada for that matter, close allies of the UK, where national and local elections are routinely stolen in both these countries. Who can ever forget the 2000 and again the 2004 Presidential Elections fiasco in the USA, Florida and Ohio respectively, or the last two national elections in Canada where a new dimension was appended to the word fraudulent. But of course you know this well David as do the leaders of the other parties in the House of Commons, but none of you want change or a decent electoral system in the UK because the current and fraudulent one serves your purposes adequately and keeps genuine representatives of the people out of parliament.

 

For example, as things stand diversity in the House of Commons is non-existent, other political parties not deemed as mainstream are seriously disadvantaged, prevented from having any free electoral airtime on the BBC and the other UK media because they haven’t any MPs while your Tories, Labour and the Lib-Dems hog it all and voters are essentially left high and dry with nowt else but Hobson’s Choice handed to them; in other words take it or leave it. It’s all smoke and mirrors with you lot when you talk about democracy, isn’t it?

 

Furthermore, there’s no ethical selection of candidates either for parliamentary or local council seats where the Tories, labour or Lib-Dems are concerned, since it’s not the membership of the respective parties or even the constituency voters in open primaries that determine who the eventual party candidates are but rather an unrepresentative Cabal of central office party apparatchiks that do so and anyone with fresh ideas or who challenges the status quo that the three major parties rely so heavily on and benefit enormously from hasn’t a snowflake in hell’s chance of being selected as a candidate.

 

And there have even been instances, very rare I must admit, where a local constituency party, in the case of all three of the major parties, has either overwhelmingly or even unanimously chosen as their parliamentary candidate someone who they feel will best represent the interests of that respective constituency but who nevertheless found himself or herself rejected by the party’s hierarchy with the democratic will of the local constituency party dismissively overturned and instead a favourite, invariably an outsider to that constituency but who is either a relative, friend or has the right connections with the party’s hierarchy, is imposed on that constituency with the local constituency party’s choice of candidate summarily rejected. Not exactly democracy in action, is it David?

 

Moreover, please tell me if you can why if you, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the rest of you, hopelessly out of touch with reality, the electorate and the 21st Century and who individually as well as collectively have never held down a proper job in your lives, are so committed to democracy as you say David, why on earth is there a need for a party Chief Whip and Deputies in parliament and whose official role is to force MPs, whether or not they want to, to always toe the official party line or else at best get themselves severely disciplined or worst still even be expelled from the party for not doing so? Aren’t MPs supposed to be in the House of Commons first and foremost to represent the best interests of their constituents who elected them to office in the first place and not simply to act as cannon fodder for the likes of you David, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the arrogant bully boy apparatchiks that run your respective parties; acting not in the interest of us mere subjects, as you see us the average British citizen, but I hasten to add those of your business and corporate pals as well as the military industrial complex that collectively have bought and paid for the lot of you. And therefore have you firmly in their pockets?

 

The 135 independent observers from over 23 countries that monitored the Crimean referendum all declared it to be free, fair and above board; which incidentally begs the question, how many monitors or observers do Britain, the US, Canada, the EU states or the rest of the arrogant west have in their territories come election time to monitor your elections? But as with the same exceptionalist mindset you have when it comes to your possession of nuclear weapons which you can tenaciously hang on to and even upgrade contrary to the NPT provisions, that actually you’re a party and signatory to, while arrogantly and belligerently denying others the same right to even contemplate having nuclear weapons of their own let alone develop them for their own protection, which is what you say you have yours for, with you it’s all about we can be trusted but others who aren’t our friends or collaborators as in NATO can’t be. Never mind that your actions quite often conflict with your empty words.

 

But hey! You’re white, Caucasian and belong to the Master Race, don’t you? And what’s more are God’s Chosen People as well; as you ensured that the entire world knew David when you visited Israel in your role as PM in March 2014, assertively stating while you were there that you have Jewish ancestry. So even if you don’t win the next General Election David, Britain will still have another Jew at the helm of British politics as its Prime Minister in the shape of Ed Miliband, and with him also a staunch Zionist and committed friend of apartheid Israel as you are David it’ll be business as usual. And what really pisses me off is that you Zionist Jews while having no problems ethnically cleansing the Palestinians from their millennia old ancestral homeland as your white Caucasian lot did to the Aborigines of Australia, Maoris of New Zealand and the indigenous inhabitants of North America for example, wiping Palestine off the map of the world and replacing it increasingly with a Zionist apartheid Israel exclusively as a homeland for European settler Jews who unlike the Palestinians aren’t Semites even though they fraudulently claim to be but are effectively the descendants of white Caucasian Europeans whose ancestors had converted to Judaism.

 

Without a touch of irony and shamelessly so as well you not only don’t mind living in other peoples’ countries while arrogating to yourselves the right to have Israel solely for Jews but also assume that it’s your paramount privilege to be in charge of and moreover run these countries as well, as you’re cheerfully doing in the UK David, AIPAC etc are in the United States and Ed Miliband similarly wants to do in the UK. And before you hit back by saying that you and Ed Miliband were both born in the UK, which I fully accept, my response to that is so were the Palestinians in Palestine where they’re native to that land and have lived in for millennia unlike your family David or that of Ed Miliband relative to England or even the rest of the UK. And the Palestinian analogy is also quite pertinent in the case of other indigenous peoples globally that you white Caucasians have savagely either ethnically cleansed, displaced or exterminated.

 

But neither you nor Ed Miliband takes any bloody cognisance of that in your rabid support for Israel, do you? Yet as I earlier mentioned one of you Zionist Jews will be Prime Minister of the UK, with or without the incorporation of Scotland, after the next UK general election. So how do you justify this hypocrisy and rank double standards both of you? All the same, and with all the sarcasm that I can muster, how very nice to know that it’s not the general interests of the average Brit suffering under severe austerity caused by the actions of a bunch of venal and incompetent assholes from both sides of the aisle of the House of Commons purportedly running our country but a foreign, Zionist and apartheid state where the primary interests of yourself David, together with that of Nick Clegg and Ed Miliband all of whom along with the likes of Boris Johnson, yet another Jew, are angling for the position of Prime Minister of Britain lay!

 

So I’m not the least bit surprised David that you and your ilk disapprove of what has gone on in the Crimea and use the kind of dishonest language that you’re also so good at in vilifying what took place there, and regrettably get away with what you’re doing because the majority of British voters not only consider our electoral system a bloody sham, and which accounts partially for their apathy, but also because most of them are totally distrustful of your lot and absolutely hold you all in contempt, knowing as well that as things stands you all have such a grip on the political system that there’s bugger all they can do to change matters other than by means of a revolution and that’s not the British way. More’s the pity!

 

So if there’s any mockery going on David it’s what the Crimean referendum makes of the likes of you David and the overwhelming majority of your MP colleagues in the House of Commons and what you stand for and that’s why you feel you must criticize what went on there as it additionally throws a ruddy great spanner in the works of the global hegemonic and geopolitical objectives of the US and its satrapies, and that includes the UK, in your relentless and onward march eastwards towards Russia’s borders with the delusional hope that in doing so you will eventually succeed in securing the Crimea as a major base for NATO. Dream on!

 

Now you’re an old Eton boy David Cameron and I would have thought that you would have been aware that even when France and Britain fought Russia in the Crimean War and bombarded that part of the Russian Empire with the hope of getting their hands on Crimea that enterprise failed abysmally and they were jointly unable to wrest the Crimea from Russia; so why the hell would Russia, which has had a naval presence in the Crimea continuously since 1783 let you do so now? That would be analogous to some foreign power trying to wrest Portsmouth or Southampton from the English. And especially after the numerous promises the west made to Russia post the collapse of the Soviet Union relative to not having NATO advance eastwards to Russia’s borders, promises which were instantly broken as was evidenced in the Baltic, Poland, Romania etc who can blame Russia for taking a firm stance over the Crimea which is actually right on its doorstep? Think on it Old Boy!

 

And that’s what really pisses you, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband and the rest of them off isn’t it David? After all you recognized Kosovo’s right to self-determination and were quite happy to observe the further break up of Serbia through having it lose Montenegro, and you boasted David about how Argentina and the rest of the world must recognize and accept the will of the 2000 people on the Falkland Islands in their UK sponsored referendum, so why don’t you and those that think like you do the same relative to the almost three million people of the autonomous republic of Crimea that for centuries was geographically, culturally and linguistically part of Russia but was capriciously given by Nikita Khrushchev to the Ukraine in 1954 when they were both part of the USSR without any consultation either with the Crimean people or the Ukrainians come to that and de facto stayed with Ukraine when the USSR imploded in 1991?

 

And now having witnessed the events in Kiev occasioned by the Nazis and Fascists that especially the US, UK, Germany and France have put in power there through a brutal and murderous coup financed at the rate of $US50 per day to the street thugs of the Nazi and Fascist parties that brought about this illegal and unconstitutional power grab in Kiev, something that the Crimeans and indeed most Ukrainians had nothing to do with, and sensibly not wanting to be a part of it, why in those circumstances don’t you and others like you David, as if we didn’t already know the answer to that question, not accept the inalienable right of the Crimeans to determine their own future especially when nothing but lawlessness prevails in Kiev regardless of how much gloss you put on it or how blatantly you parade this illegitimate puppet thug of yours and so-called prime minister there on the international stage to garner respectability for him?

 

Any true believer in democracy would not only accept and embrace the decision of the Crimean people but would also wish them well; so it shows with your refusal to do so what a hypocrite and purveyor of double standards you really are but people like myself already knew that David; and besides we also know that you have to please your US chain puller every bit as Angela Merkel and the rest of them are evidently obliged to. In your case David willingly so, as you and your current cabinet colleagues made perfectly clear on your visits to the US when you were still in opposition promising to do everything the US demanded of you; while in Angela Merkel’s case it’s thanks to the US’s blackmail of her, her covert links with Stasi being one such hold over her, and obviously the NSA file on her from its intensive spying and other surveillance of this woman.

 

Now we have that idiot the west has installed in Kiev as PM threatening all manner of atrocities on those in Crimea who instigated and organized the populist referendum there, openly promising that hellfire will burn under their feet and there’ll be no hiding place for them. Just imagine for a just a second or so that those were the words of the Argentinean President after the Falklands referendum and were directed at the people ton those islands or even British officials, we all know what would happen. There would immediately be hell to pay for Argentina with Britain referring the matter to the UN Security Council and all the rest of it. But when it comes to the west’s Nazi puppet in Kiev there’s not a dickey bird’s tweet coming from you David, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband or the rest of you charlatans.

 

In addition to all that the Nazi head of security and the armed forces in Kiev has threatened Russia with a nuclear attack saying that the Ukraine has the capacity and the determination to build and deliver nuclear weapons within 3-6 months. Again no comment or condemnation from the west on what is a real threat to Europe as Ukraine does have the nuclear knowhow to build at least a dirty bomb and in Soviet times actually hosted nuclear weapons. But can you imagine with the west’s fixation with Iran’s non-existent nuclear threat what the response would have been not only from western governments but also their media if such a threat instead of emanating from the Ukraine had been made by some official in Iran? For as you said yourself David while you were recently in Israel that Iran must never be permitted to have nuclear weapons, which in your skewed thinking relative to Iran would not only be a major threat to Israel, paramount in your concerns no doubt as the Zionist you are, but also a threat to the world.

 

No such concerns about Ukraine having them though and what’s more asininely threatening to use them against a superpower with a well stocked nuclear arsenal of the sort that Russia has and the rest of the world is well aware of. What, pray tell, does this prime asshole, or you for that matter David, think that Russia would do, just sit on its hands and say ah well it’s not worth responding to? And wouldn’t such a reckless act on the part of Ukraine pose a real as apart from a fabricated threat in Iran’s case to the whole world; for sure as the sun rises in the east Russia would respond and quite massively so. But you David are just as idiotic as this nutter in Kiev for you have just sent RAF fighter jets to patrol the borders of Russia. What a bloody waste of time and money that Britain can ill afford, and no one in the House of Commons has the balls to tell you so.

 

This bearing in mind and adding insult to injury that an increasing number of British working families are having to turn to charitable food banks to make ends meet while within the same UK the five richest families own more wealth than the combined total of over 20% of British people at the lower end of the economic scale. But David Cameron doesn’t mind risking a thermo-nuclear war to ensure that the interests of the 1% are catered for as opposed to that of the bulk of our population. And honestly ask yourselves, in a nuclear tussle with Russia who do you think will win? Answers please, as they say, on the back of a postage stamp.

 

Britain posturing as usual and asininely trying to punch above its weight, with complete morons living in your world of fantasy. Meanwhile Jews are again fleeing Europe this time from Ukraine courtesy of the Nazi and Fascist government that the west have installed in Kiev, and those that have reluctantly decided to stay are getting paramilitary training from the Israeli Defence Force in order to defend themselves; this in 2014, the 21st Century and a throwback to the days of World War II when the Waffen SS ancestors of these current Fascist and Nazi killers liquidated not only Jews but Russians and Poles. And the agenda of their descendants is exactly the same. In 2014; but all that you David Cameron, Nick Clegg, Ed Miliband, Boris Johnson and the rest of you along with the US and NATO can think of is the west’s geopolitican positioning in eastern Europe. A situation that’s compounded by deliberately adopting a Nelsonian blind eye to what is happening in the Ukraine thanks to your unwarranted intervention there and when challenged on this passing it off as Russian propaganda.

 

From my own personal perspective it’s sincerely hoped that the Frankenstein monster that the west has unleashed in Ukraine will do precisely what did happen in that original scenario, and that these descendants of Ukraine’s World War II notorious Waffen SS do a much better job than what their parents and grandparents did; but instead of killing decent citizens, be they Russians or Jews, that they concentrate instead on actually wiping out en masse the Zionist scum of all kinds and not least so those that brought them to power; and as much as I detest these odious Ukrainian scumbags I’ll be more than delighted to provide them with the names of several of our own British Zionist scum that they can flex their muscles on.

 

Since I’m wholeheartedly of the view that some ethnic cleansing of the right sort wouldn’t at all be a bad thing for Britain; analogous to setting a cane field on fire at harvest time. It gets rid of trash, snakes and replenishes the soil. And there’s a hell of a lot of trash and snakes in Britain, trust me; and high time that we replenished, proverbially speaking, our own soil!

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Saturday 15 march 2014 6 15 /03 /Mar /2014 15:20

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

Angela Merkel has threatened Russia with “massive damage” if the referendum in Crimea takes place on Sunday 16 March 2014. Oh yeah! Have I missed something here or what? Isn’t this analogous to the bastards who run the Royal bank of Scotland, which exists only because of a massive taxpayers’ bailout yet still continues to run up massive financial debts, attempting to blackmail the British public by threatening to do even more badly if we the taxpayers don’t allow its executives and other principal employees to continue having their enormous and quite ludicrous bonuses on the asinine pretext that they need to have these as incentives to attract and keep the best staff there is in the banking business? Well if these are the best then give me the worst I say!

 

In her condemnation of Russia and Crimea Angela Merkel also echoes the hypocrisy of the US, the rest of the EU and that of other western satrapies that such a referendum is illegal and unconstitutional and infringes Ukraine’s territorial and sovereign integrity. How odd, when Germany did exactly the sorts of things Angela Merkel is now complaining about in Yugoslavia on behalf of its wartime ally Croatia and equally in Serbia when with its NATO partners it dismantled Yugoslavia and wrenched Kosovo from Serbia at the barrel of a gun, with no plebiscite granted to the Albanians in Kosovo on whose behalf this unilateral independence move was trumpeted, compounded by the aforementioned UDI by a bunch of terroristic, criminal and other odious henchmen doing the west’s bidding in Kosovo. Furthermore, this so-called independence was recognized by Germany, its EU and NATO pals long before the UN was strong-armed by them to follow suit.

 

German MP Gregor Gysi following Merkel’s speech in the German Bundestag caustically lambasted her for her hypocrisy and blatant double standards regarding the Crimea when set against her quite enthusiastic support for and hasty recognition of Kosovo as an independent country when it was in effect an integral territorial part of Serbia in the same way that Hamburg or Hesse are of Germany, while Crimea is an autonomous republic in Ukraine, transferred to the latter in 1954 from being an integral part of Russia for centuries in an administrative move when both the Ukraine and Crimea were part of the then USSR.

 

As for Germany and the rest of the west’s alleged respect for other’s territorial integrity how about Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, the Yemen, Pakistan, Somalia, Sudan, Venezuela and Syria among many other countries where the west has not only shown a marked lack for such integrity in these countries but has also gone on to meddle in their internal affairs politically and militarily with disastrous consequences for the local people, varying from attacks and invasions by the west, usually NATO, to the funding, training and arming of terrorist insurgents sent into these countries by these western states to operate in these targeted countries; fostering armed conflict, to the break up of these countries and the recognition of the west’s hived off portions as occurred in Kosovo and again in Sudan as independent nations and where with indecent haste, in the case of Sudan, the US recognized Southern Sudan as an independent nation the very next day, and even sent an ambassador promptly there.

 

In Syria the same mindset prevails with scores of German, UK, US and other NATO and EU countries’ Special Forces covertly operating there in an undeclared war by the west that was entirely responsible for starting all the mayhem currently being witnessed there in the first place. And in neighbouring Iraq despite Britain and the US having theoretically exited from that country they and their allies are still very instrumental in all the bloodshed we hear about and witness going on there. All of which has one specific purpose in mind, namely the geopolitical objectives of the west and most specifically the US and its EU satrapies. Additionally the west and that includes Germany funds, trains and arms jihadists now fighting in Syria as they did in Libya; while the US in particular does the same in Latin America, most notably Venezuela. Clear examples of blatant double standards and outright hypocrisy on the part of the west now bellyaching about Crimea.

 

Then there are the US and Britain’s drone wars in Afghanistan, North Africa, Yemen and elsewhere, and Britain has made it known that when it pulls out of its illegal invasion of Afghanistan in a war that has gone one there longer than the duration of World Wars I and II combined these UK killer drones will be moved to bases in Africa and the Middle East. But the US and Britain aren’t alone in these acts of contravening other countries’ sovereignty. France and the rest of NATO also do the same, and while apparently it’s okay for a dictatorial and puppet president of Mali very much under the thumb of his former colonial ruler France to invite French troops into Mali.

 

However any notion of the Crimean people who are overwhelmingly ethnic Russian, having seen what has transpired in Kiev and how the west has embraced it even when the language of the Crimea people has been proscribed, to ask their close neighbours and countrymen in Russia and de facto the Russian parliament and government to come to their assistance in an emergency, that according to the warped minds of these western leaders is wrong and an interference in Ukraine’s domestic affairs. This despite the fact that neither Crimea nor the vast majority of the people of east Ukraine played any part in the coup that brought odious Fascists and Nazis to power in Kiev with the support of the west and don’t want to have anything to do with them.

 

So these western countries condemnation of Russia for not doing what they themselves routinely do in other peoples’ countries and consent to their bullying to influence Crimea not to hold its referendum, even if Russia could or felt disposed to, is double standards gone barmy. And as for Russia having military personnel in Crimea that’s like wilfully ignoring the fact that the US has hundred of bases in 139 countries globally; British bases in Cyprus and French ones in several African countries where these supposedly now independent African countries but once French colonies have no say in them being there, with France unilaterally deciding where to have them and how many and what kinds of personnel they have located there. Read my published article France loots Africa, liquidates dissidents on http://www.politicoacademic.blogspot.com.

 

Whilst in marked contrast Russia has had a military presence in Crimea since 1783 when the former 13 British North American colonies that formed the fledgling United States of America having declared their independence from Britain in 1776 after their successful war of Independence to determine their own future, as Crimea is now attempting to do, were just six years in existence and Cyprus with its UK so-called sovereign bases where the Cypriots have no jurisdiction at all wasn’t a colony then, as it is now any longer of Britain; yet the UK still sees fit to have bases there thousands of miles away from its borders of the UK and by no stretch of the imagination in the region of western Europe.

 

As previously stated elsewhere Crimea is culturally, linguistically and psychologically part of Russia; something that one can’t say for the Cypriots vis-à-vis the UK. Moreover the population of the Crimea is overwhelmingly ethnic Russian and see themselves as Russians. And to reiterate the point earlier made the Crimea has been physically a part of Russia for several centuries until 1954 when President of the USSR Nikita Khrushchev administratively made it a part the Ukraine not expecting, as did anyone else for that matter, that decades later the USSR with western interference would break up. And even then Crimea’s link to Ukraine was a loose one with Crimea retaining full autonomy within the framework of a greater Ukraine; so Russia presence in the Crimea is by any definition far more legitimate and logical than that of Britain’s in Cyprus ever could be classified.

 

Yet Britain and the west see nothing wrong with Britain “occupying” sovereign bases in Cyprus but Crimea which has Russia on its doorstep shouldn’t have its kith and kin anywhere near that place. How utterly bizarre when the Australian regime can send Aussie troops to Afghanistan to assist their white kith and kin there. For if that’s not the case please explain to me if you can when was the last time that Afghanistan threatened attacked or invaded Australia located on the other side of the world and isn’t even, or could it logically be, a member of NATO: which as far as I know literally stands for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and Aussie-land is very much located in the far reaches of the South Pacific Ocean. So if white Caucasians who have ethnically cleansed large parts of Australia that dwarf the entire British Isles several times over of their aboriginal populations, stolen by savage brute force their country where these people lived alone, continuously and undisturbed for over 60,000 years and still treat those Aborigines that have managed to survive like dirt, can send forces to help out what they see as the Mother Country in its illegal wars, why the hell shouldn’t the Russians who are next door to the Crimea not do the same in respect of their own kith and kin?

 

Which begs the further question if after all Russia is condemned by these jerks in the west, and we know who the usual suspects are, for its association with Crimea, what the hell is Britain doing in Cyprus, France in supposedly independent African countries and the US in all these bases that it has globally, including those in Britain, Germany, Japan but most notoriously Guantanamo Bay: a very physical and integral part of a sovereign and independent Cuba where for in excess of 50 years now the Cubans have been demanding their territory back and requesting that the US leave their country; but to no avail! And if this is a classic example of disrespect for and the blatant usurpation of the rights of another sovereign and independent country as well as its national integrity then I don’t know what is.

 

But you see when it comes to justice and fair play these aren’t characteristics that are interpreted as they should be by the west, but are essentially determined by what the west and most particularly the US and its European satrapies decide are in their own best interests and to hell with anyone who thinks differently or raises the issue of hypocrisy and double standards. So basically justice should be defined and spelt, relative to the behaviour and mindset of the west, as JUST-US, as in just us; namely the US and its satrapies. But when these utterly abhorrent and absolutely moronic clowns want to vilify others and parade themselves dishonestly and self-centredly as the fanciful champions of others with all the garbage they hubristically employ of human rights and the sickening rest of it that they don’t actually believe in except in respect of themselves and never practice even at home, then we hear a lot about JUSTICE. The sort of justice that all honourable people recognize, but now in these selected and quite perverse incidences on behalf of people the west sanctimoniously claims it’s rooting for but don’t even bother to consult, we see the pretence of JUSTICE being disreputably used by the west as a battering ram to clout those who highlight and condemn their dishonest and perfidious actions.

 

Gregor Gysi the German MP who lambasted Angela Merkel for her dishonesty in the speech she gave to the German Bundestag on Thursday 13 March 2014 immediately after she stepped down from that podium where he would subsequently deliver his attack on her equated Crimea’s situation to that of Kosovo with two major differences. The Albanians in Kosovo had no choice in Kosovo becoming a so-called independent state which it clearly isn’t, as it can’t exist unilaterally financially and depends exclusively for its funding from western handouts and the multiplicity of criminal activities organized and run by the odious bunch of mafia thugs put in charge there by the west.

 

In marked contrast all the Crimean people will have their democratic say in the plebiscite being carried out in Crimea on Sunday 16 March 2014; and while Serbia was bombed into submission by the west and threatened with a land invasion as well by that same entity unless it relinquished Kosovo to the unilateral control of the thugs that the US and its European satrapies had put in place there for their own geopolitical objectives and the expansion of NATO onto Russia’s borders, Russia hasn’t done the same with Crimea nor would it embark on doing so with what are essentially its Russian kith and kin in Crimea.

 

And why posits Gregor Gysi is it okay on the part of the west for Kosovo to have its independence unilaterally and with no plebiscite in that province; okay too for the Falkland Islanders to have a western backed referendum; for South Sudan with the west’s covert military intervention and open political support to also have its independence; for Scotland to have a referendum on whether it wants to stay in the United Kingdom or not, but when the Basque people of Spain and the Catalonians there want to decide their own future for themselves; and when Crimea states that it wants to do likewise, the same western countries that sanctions all of the aforementioned and are quite comfortable with their instigated outcomes suddenly, truculently and rather bizarrely declare such objectives by these latter groups of people to be illegal, unconstitutional or else infringing the sovereignty of the lands they don’t want these people to separate from, be it Spain or Ukraine.

 

The very Spain that while refusing the Basque and Catalonian peoples the right to make their own informed and free choices relative to their future in or outside of Spain, none the less demands that the people of Gibraltar and that territory be transferred lock stock and barrel to Spain since Gibraltar was once a part of Spain before Britain sized it militarily and kept it as a British outpost in the region. But even so Britain doesn’t look good either in this since its stance is one that Gibraltar is forever British and that Gibraltarians  have an inviolate right as to whether they remain British or not. So to hell with Spain’s claim of sovereign integrity; however the same Britain has no such regard for the democratic wishes of the Crimean people because what they want doesn’t tie in with the geopolitical wishes of Britain’s puppet master the United States of America.

 

Frankly, all this has absolutely nothing to do with the wishes let alone the best interests of the people directly involved or the countries they live in and which are either unhappily or unwillingly implicated in this ludicrous political tug of war, but rather everything to do with western global hegemony and geopolitical interests. And if breaking up sovereign states or supporting the nebulous or even the non-existent claims of non-state entities under the rather spurious guise of affording them the right to self-determination or even independence, ploys that serve the goals of these western state players, then in the minds of their leaders and those of their satrapies self-determination and all the rest of it become paramount; must be respected; vigorously encouraged; and most certainly adhered to by any means at the west’s disposal. However, when it’s not in the west’s own self-interests identical situations must be instantly condemned and those supporting them dishonestly and virulently vilified.

 

In his justified attack on Angela Markel’s speech in the Bundestag and her fraudulently contrived bellicosity against Russia and the Crimean people Gregor Gysi pointed out that when Germany and its NATO partners were championing Kosovo’s unilateral independence and then actually recognized it a full two years before the UN did so, he’d warned his parliamentary colleagues and most specifically the German government that they and the rest of the west involved in what was going on were literally opening a Pandora’s Box through sanctioning this illegal action, and whose repercussions would not only set a dangerous political precedence but also backfire on all of its participants and supporters.

 

Notwithstanding this they’d all refused to listen to him Gregor Gysi went on, additionally caught up he explained in their hubristic self congratulations and backslapping of each other on what they saw as their successful efforts at having forced upon the USSR its own dissolution, and entirely buoyed up by this undoubtedly considered themselves to be the Invincibles capable of doing no wrong and in effect very much entitled in the circumstances to unchallenged embark on whatever they chose to, regardless of how reckless or criminal these activities were. The major problem with this being that the nightmare they created has come back to haunt them.

 

For if they genuinely believe that what they instigated and that subsequently actually transpired in Kosovo, Sudan, the Falkland Islands, Gibraltar and with the west’s active participation or approval at its worst will take place in Scotland in September 2014 is just and fair, why using the same criteria is it wrong for Crimea and other territories or regions like the Basque country and Catalonia to likewise be free and entitled to choose their own self-determination?

 

And who that saw his performance can forget David Cameron’s smug and hubristic remarks as he gleefully rubbed salt into the wounds of Argentina’s incumbent President, in the same way that a feral and unsophisticated moron would pull the wings of a live butterfly, when he said that the Falkland Islanders had in their referendum spoken and in doing so had unequivocally made their choice to be British; a clear-cut decision for self-determination David Cameron went on to say that the Argentinean President should both respect and recognize. A fait accompli in other words, notwithstanding the long running dispute between the UK and Argentina over these islands, also known as the Islas Malvinas, that are on Argentina’s continental se shelf but over 8000 miles away from Britain.

 

But David Cameron is not alone in this kind of hypocrisy which has been par for the course with every US president in living memory and includes the incumbent holder of that office Barrack Obama who likewise mouthed ad nauseum the same self-serving and dishonest mantra as and when required to mask their numerous, profoundly unconstitutional and undoubted criminal activities. For example no one asked the indigenous inhabitants of Diego Garcia and the rest of the Chagos Islands whether or not they wanted to be ethnically cleansed in the 1960s from their homeland and for it to be turned into yet another US overseas military base on the main island of Diego Garcia,

 

The result of a secret bilateral deal between a dominant US calling, or rather dictating the shots to a subservient Britain because the former arrogantly wanted to have the Diego Garcia location for a military base, yet another overseas one with no comparable quid pro quo situation foreign military bases to be legally permitted on US soil. A situation made relatively easy due to the fact that consecutive post World War II UK governments and the British elite as well persist in living, even in 2014 as it happens, in a distinctly permanent and patently comatose state of denial, refusing to accept that Britain no longer rules the world and the days of the Raj, Bwana and Memsahib are gone forever.

 

So to keep up the pretence, like a lady of leisure who’s fallen on hard times, Britain and France too have facilitated the US becoming their sugar daddy, willingly allowing it to use them both for its own ends while enabling them in turn to bizarrely delude themselves that life for them hasn’t changed at all from what it actually previously was even though in reality it’s altogether quite different. A ludicrous delusion that has Britain and France thinking that they’re still world powers, and with permanent seats and vetoes in the United Nations Security Council reinforcing that view, with the absolute right, albeit with US sanction, to run the world regardless of whether or not those that are targeted for this dubious honour actually wanting to be singled out in this way.

 

And listening closely to what passed for a debate in the United Nations Security Council’s chamber on Thursday 13 March 2014 where an essentially warm welcome was given to an illegitimate coup leader heading an illegal Nazi, fascist, murderous and bloodthirsty regime in Kiev, quite unsurprisingly so it must be said when apart from Russia and China all the currently members of the UNSC, including the US, UK and France as permanent and veto wielding members, are western, white Caucasian states and satrapies, while wholesale condemnation by these cretins were hurled at Russia for what are basically its fictional violations of international laws and the rest of it vis-à-vis Crimea. While at the same time declaring Crimea’s upcoming and republic-wide plebiscite and Russia’s support for this as illegal. To be honest with you that really turns logic on its head.

 

This notwithstanding the fact that not only Britain but also the EU, US and the west generally still refuse to countenance let alone acknowledge or accede to the wish for the return of their country and the desire for self-determination by the overwhelming majority of the Chaggossian people brutally treated and savagely evicted en masse and without compensation from their homeland by Britain at the behest of the United States and their swift  replacement by a US military base on Diego Garcia, have routinely seen these actions that manifestly and blatantly violate international law declared as illegal by the UK’s highest court with a binding recommendation by it that the Chaggossians be given back their homeland and resettled there at Britain’s expense.

 

Legal rulings however that consecutive UK governments have contemptuously ignored over the past decades using the antiquated Royal Prerogative to arbitrarily and without parliamentary oversight, not that our MPs or House of Lords members care a damn either about the Chaggossians or would have acted any differently, to override the UK’s Supreme Court’s rulings in the same way that these PMs and government ministers have used the same Royal Prerogative to grant immunity from prosecution to Northern Ireland terrorists and even Royal Pardons to some of them who were properly convicted in court and jailed.

 

And Britain is most certainly not alone in its contempt for the UK’s courts relative to their rulings on the Chaggossian issue. The United States also does the same. For having turned these paradisiacal settings into an integral part of their illegal rendition programme: unlawful kidnappings, torture and even the murder in other words of those unfortunate enough to be caught up in the US’s war on terror, the United States has additionally throughout its presence on the Chagos islands and as it still does in 2014 continues to add gross insult to injury not only to the Chaggossians but also British MPs, other UK parliamentarians, members of the British public and curiously even Her Majesty the Queen who is the constitutional Head of State of the Chagos Islands, in prohibiting them all or anyone else for that matter from setting foot anywhere on the Chagos islands without the express permission of the United States President, Secretary of Defence or specified senior military commanders based at the Pentagon.

 

Permission that is rarely ever granted; creating a situation where British citizens or officials can’t visit what are in international law legally British overseas territories. Can you believe it? And do you think that the US government or people would in anyway tolerate any such situation taking place in reverse by a foreign power in Puerto Rico, Guam or the US Virgin Islands for example? So all the ranting and sanctimonious humbug loquaciously emanating from moronic amateurs like Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland, John Kerry and the rest of them is so much noxious shit that there just wouldn’t be sufficient sewerage plants across the entirety of Britain, the rest of the EU, the United States or for that matter the western world to contain and clean up if it were actually human bodily waste disposal instead of the verbal diarrhoea that these consummate prats and jackasses are simply crapping the rest of the world with.

 

I began with Angela Merkel and will end with her. However, before I do let me state unequivocally that British though I am I nevertheless have a profound love for Germany, the German people and thoroughly enjoy my stay in Germany and nothing, not even a Chancellor like Angela Merkel will ever change or mar any of this. All the same that won’t stop me from outspokenly speaking truth to power no matter where such abuses take place. Angela Merkel is a product of her upbringing as are most of us in one way or another. Her parents who voluntarily left what was then West Germany went with the entire family to live in communist East Germany. That was a committed choice and not one that was forced upon them.  In her youth and as a student Angela Markel worked as an informant for the Stasi that employed the same tactics as the Nazis did in unified Germany during World War II. As an adult Angela Merkel continued her covert work with the Stasi and benefited enormously. However always the skilful survivor and egotistical with it Angela Merkel was astute enough as the collapse of the USSR loomed and the Berlin Wall came down to reinvent herself.

 

In this regard Angela Merkel acted exactly like the Nazi enthusiast and Austrian camp commander Kurt Waldheim who masked all his Nazi past and post World War II portrayed himself as a having been a staunch anti-Nazi activist during the war; a persona he used with US, British and French help to become Secretary General of the United Nations. And if you seem surprised by this let’s remember that these three aforementioned entities of the UK, United States and France assisted many prominent and even quite odious wartime Nazis when doing so coincided with their own selfish interests and the figure of those helped literally run into the thousands. At Nuremburg only those convenient for giving the United States, Britain and France the fig leaf that they were determinedly against Nazism in all its manifestations and were unwavering in their efforts to eradicating it were tried in these show trials and expediently executed. You mightn’t know this but apart from the many prominent Nazis that the US not only covertly took in but also helped to develop new lives for themselves in Latin America, over 175,000 of them from Ukraine’s Waffen SS Brigades along with their families were relocated to the UK at the United Sates’ insistence, and where their descendants live to this day and go around calling themselves the English Defence League and pretending they’re more English than the rest of us.

 

Still Nazi at heart like their parents and grandparents the US had them resettled in the UK as it had these delusions that after the end of World War II the US could use these odious bastards with their pathological hatred of everything Russian to be the foot soldiers in the war which US was secretly planning against the Soviet Union. Somewhere along the line commonsense prevailed and that war which would have been a hugely devastating one never occurred, but in its place the Cold War as it came to be known was born. And in case you gotten ahead of yourselves as to where I’m going with this one, yes the Nazis now in power in Kiev thanks to the United States are the very descendants too of those World War II Waffen SS, Ukrainian Nazis that created so much mayhem in Eastern Europe specifically against the Russians and what are now publicly at any rate the US, France and Britain’s post World War II favourite people, although not so at the time, the Jews; with David Cameron even proudly declaring his Zionist Jewish credentials and supposedly Jewish familial links on his recent official visit to Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu in response referring to him as family. Consequently none of what is happening in the Ukraine with its US installed and backed Nazi regime is coincidence or an accident; as it’s simply a case of the wheel, in this case the US’s one, have turned full circle.

 

Similarly Kurt Waldheim’s meteoric rise in UN politics wasn’t as a result of him duping the US, UK or France; oh no! They already knew who and what he was and like the Nazis currently in charge in Ukraine they knew exactly what he was and moreover what he’s done. After all France had expelled more Jews to Europe’s death camps than any other country and prior to the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour the overwhelming majority of Americans were very pro-Nazi; the US government had been consistently supplying Germany’s Third Reich with sophisticated weaponry; ships bringing Jewish refugees from Europe to the United States were refused permission to dock in US harbours and sent back to their ports of origin in mainland Europe where their Jewish passengers ended up in the death ovens that were replete across that continent; one of George W. Bush’s grandfather was the official banker for the German Nazi Party, while the other was deeply involved as were many others of his ilk who were associated with corporations doing the same and either producing or marketing the Zyklon B gas that was used to kill many of the Nazis’ holocaust victims. You could use if you like the famed expression in Death of a Salesman that “Business was Business, but there is no getting away from the fact that the American, the French and British leaders pre and post World War II knew exactly who the real and even the most dirty Nazis were.

 

An America friend of mine was told me that her country didn’t have any friends just useful idiots that they use and who are expendable if and when the need arises. She was spot on. And to them, the Brits and the French Kurt Waldheim was such a one. This trio knew all along what Kurt Waldheim was but the era of the cold war had begun and therefore the United States of America with Britain and France clinging on the coattails of the new heavyweight on the block felt that their interests would be better served, and particularly so in the UN Security Council that they controlled, in having a hardened Nazi there at the helm so to speak, even if he was publicly pretending to be something that he wasn’t, rather than someone who was a socialist or God forbid a communist; although there was no differentiation between the two where Americans are concerned. And furthermore someone they could control since they knew his past, he knew that they did, and the very last thing that Kurt Waldheim wanted was to be publicly exposed for what he really was. So both sides got what they wanted.

 

However when the Simon Wiesenthal Foundation exposed Kurt Waldheim for what he was the United States that had engineered his ascendency to the position of UN Secretary General, and let’s be honest here no one gets to be UN Secretary general without the US’s say so, together with Britain and France quickly dropped Kurt Waldheim like a hot potato, risibly pretending for public consumption, and also to cover their asses, that they were terribly shocked by these horrid revelations pertaining to Waldheim claiming that they knew nothing about them or his past which he’d evidently, they also pretended, kept from them; which to put it mildly was bloody lie! But since when has shamelessly and openly lying to the world or even their own people ever worried these western hypocrites? And with bigger fish to fry, among this scenario being that of not upsetting the growing and increasingly powerful Zionist lobbies, Kurt Waldheim was ingloriously sacrificed. Check out for yourselves what happened to him.

 

Having like Kurt Waldheim meticulously reinvented herself Angela Merkel happily jumped on board Helmut Kohl’s bandwagon; a quid pro quo situation for both of them. Kohl for his part wanted to be seen as the re-unifier of Germany and have that as his political legacy, Merkel just wanted initially to bury her nefarious Stasi past all the deeper than she’d already done so far, and having got away with that became emboldened enough to even openly challenge and usurp the leadership of Helmut Kohl whom she viciously stabbed in the back to get her way with Helmut Kohl never managing to get over this appalling betrayal of hers. Now this incredibly self-serving and highly ambitious woman could even emulate Kurt Waldheim and pragmatically aspire in her case to become the leader and also the first female chancellor of a reunified Germany and with few people knowing anything about her Stasi past. After all many Nazis, and not only Kurt Waldheim, did the same reinvention of themselves even pretending to be Jews and emigrating to the United States with New York alone full of such people. Since these Nazis knew the Jews that they betrayed or even killed quite intimately as they were their close neighbours or friends and therefore knew most things about them. Likewise Stasi members in relation to ordinary members of the East German public.

 

But we all know from whistleblower Edward Snowden’s revelations that the NSA spied extensively on Angela Merkel and with good reason from their standpoint; they knew who and what she really is, and with the United States fixated about communists they were simply treating her in reverse if you like as they did Kurt Waldheim before his public exposure. Now it’s not at all rocket science, so do ask yourselves honestly why when the US has spied on Angela Merkel so intensely does she none the less go out on a limb to fight the same US’s corner as she’s doing in the case of Crimea well aware that any resultant fractured relations with Russia a major trading partner and principal gas supplier to Germany will certainly damage Germany’s economy; and as Chancellor of Germany surely the well being of the Germany people should be the paramount equation in all of her deliberations?

 

The truth is that Angela Merkel has no choice. We all know that she power hungry and ruthless with it; likes being Chancellor of Germany and doesn’t want to end up if she confronts the United States like the Communist East German equivalent in her case of the Austrian Nazi Kurt Waldheim, exposed and disgraced; for it quite apparent to anyone with a functioning brain in his or her head that Angela Merkel has privately been given an ultimatum by the neo-cons in the Washington administration based on the NSA’s comprehensive snooping on her and which she can’t possibly ignore; support the United States in its Ukraine campaign against Russia or else.

 

And if you think that scenario is so much crap then ask yourselves this: if you publicly discover that a close friend or family member despicably betrayed your trust in them and went on to gratuitously spy on you and not only compromised your personal privacy but your integrity as a human being as well, would you taking all that into consideration go out of your way and on to a limb for that person unless you knew, because they told you, or else you suspected they had much more compromising dirt on you that they could publicly reveal and quite literally devastatingly destroy you? Blackmail in other words! A situation that becomes even more intriguing in Angela Merkel’s case since the German newspaper Der Tagesspiegel having canvassed the German public for their personal views on Angela Merkel’s stance relative to Russia and the Crimea revealed that a whopping 80% of the German public strongly disagree with her approach. I rest my case!

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments

Présentation

  • : collymore.over-blog.com's name
  • collymore.over-blog.com's name
  • : Deals effectively and fearlessly with political issues, current affairs, poetry, short stories and general subject matter with a view to being informative.
  • Share this blog
  • Back to homepage
  • Contact

Créer un Blog

Recherche

Calendrier

April 2014
M T W T F S S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
<< < > >>
Create your blog for free on over-blog.com - Contact - Terms of Service - Earn Royalties - Report abuse - Most commented articles