Wednesday 23 july 2014 3 23 /07 /Jul /2014 15:41

 

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

It’s a common diversionary tactic deeply inculcated and readily employed by every perfidious scoundrel there is, and that includes ingrained bootlickers like Britain’s utterly odious, dismally unaccountable and totally unrepresentative Prime Minister, David Cameron – in his case irredeemably ensconced in the markedly vile, consummately demented, hugely embarrassing for our country and pertinaciously recidivistic sewer politics that he and his Yiddish sort are extremely proficient at – that no one in our country to my knowledge did expressly vote for to hold the office of prime minister, let alone further lumber Britain with the additional burden – as if we don’t already have more than our fair share of those – through David Cameron’s unquestioning obsequiousness to Washington and the Pentagon of Britain being even more of a vassal state than it previously was under Tony Blair and Gordon Brown; that the best line of defence, and one of the most effective ways as well to deflect attention away from one’s own criminality or their active participation in that of another person or individuals with whom they’re criminally involved and, of course, hopefully cover their own ass in the process, is to vigorously go on the offensive; even when there’s no noticeable provocation from anyone to do so or apparent justification – other than the wrongdoer’s disquieting sense of guilt as is most perceptible in David Cameron’s case – to warrant such behaviour.

 

And David Cameron’s over the top, grotesquely emotive: a cynically orchestrated ploy, if ever there was one; ludicrously exaggerated - without a shred of corroborative evidence to support his spurious claims, together with his bellicose and vitriolic verbal offensive against Russia generally and President Putin in particular – even snidely and quite publicly but oh so cowardly at the same time like the Class A villainous nerd that he dementedly is, not having the guts to name anyone specifically – choosing instead to hide behind vague innuendos – among those fellow EU leaders and colleagues of his that he, David “High and Mighty” Cameron, resorts to attacking for allegedly not taking the same strident and virulently demented anti-Putin and anti-Russian but de facto the transparently obsequiously supportive and pro-American stance that he has – clearly says more about David Cameron per se than it actually does about Vladimir Putin.

 

Moreover, it instantly makes thinking individuals like me curious and naturally prompts us to wonder why it is that this Malaysian airline crash is such an irresistible and irritable bee in David Cameron’s bonnet, and decidedly so in a way that the premeditated and totally indiscriminate shelling and brutal killings sanctioned and encouraged by the US and its EU satrapies and personally authorized by Petro Poroshenko: the west’s brazenly installed puppet satrap, of the predominantly Russian speaking population in Eastern Ukraine, or for that matter the cynical, ongoing and industrial-scale ethnic slaughter of Gazans on a daily basis by the apartheid, colonialist settler regime in Tel Aviv, where in both instances more innocent deaths, principally those of women, children and the elderly, have separately, savagely and systematically been wiped out than what occurred from the Malaysian air crash.

 

Unless, that is and as I suspect, David Cameron is up to his Yiddish neck – and let’s not forget it was he who boastfully claimed white Caucasian Yiddish ancestry while on an official visit recently to Zionist apartheid Israel – in the dreadful villainy that was perpetrated against that Malaysian passenger airline flying in Eastern Ukrainian airspace and all those who were onboard. Of course if David Cameron, or anyone either connected to or supportive of him, doesn’t like or actually takes offence to what I say – not an iota of which I have any desire or intention of ever retracting and will resolutely stand by come what may – they’re perfectly at liberty to sue me, which I’ll most wholeheartedly welcome, and accordingly are likewise free to get any number of their patronage-placement - rather than ability or integrity directed - unaccountable and high status Establishment judges to oversee the case and thereby vengefully get their own back at me for having had the temerity, as they would see it, to uncompromisingly castigate them and others of their Establishment ilk for their immorally unwholesome and clandestinely criminal way of life.

 

But do I care? Not on your Nelly; and my contemptuous response to them all will unchangeably be the same as it always was – get stuffed! So make my day and go for it guys and gals! Allowing me the opportunity in a face to face public forum – i.e. the court room – to emphatically and unreservedly tell David Cameron, the rest of you Establishment jerks, your public sycophants and hangers-on what precisely I do think of you all, and afterwards unconcernedly let the loaded dice that you throw fall how it will.

 

For I shan’t be shaking in my boots, as it were, at this predictable outcome; since, while I know the concept of fear and the impact that it can negatively have on those who allow themselves either to succumb to or be a prisoner of it, I personally and un-exaggeratedly have no dread of it. Neither do I ever worry about my public reputation – particularly when it’s driven by people who don’t know me - or so-called adverse publicity, since from my individual perspective there’s no such thing as good or bad publicity, just publicity per se. Therefore, in terms of uncompromisingly speaking truth to power regardless of the social or physical consequences that may result from my doing so, that’s a non-negotiable precept that even the continuance of my life, were it to be put in mortal danger as a result from my doing so, must and will always be subordinate to.

 

And what a convenient occurrence – the seemingly mysterious crash of Malaysian Airline Flight MH17 – to take the global spotlight off the Israeli massacres currently going on in Gaza and focus world attention instead where David Cameron and his puppeteers in Washington want it to be, and unfortunately for all the wrong reasons have successfully managed to do so – the Ukraine and the concertedly US and British orchestrated worsening western relations vis-à-vis the Russian Federation generally and those with President Putin in particular.

 

A conspiracy theory? I don’t think so, bearing in mind the well-documented accounts of US and UK false flag operations in the past specifically designed to manipulatively, misinformatively and even erroneously change their respective public and even the wider global opinion on pressing foreign affairs issues and even controversial matter substantially but deceitfully in their favour.

 

And as I stated previously I honestly think – an opinion I’m holding fast to since I’ve given considerable thought to it – that relative to the circumstances surrounding the Malaysian plane that crashed in East Ukraine, not only is David Cameron knowledgeably in cahoots with his puppet masters in Washington and the Pentagon who I firmly believe ordered the demise of that plane for dogmatic political and commercial business interests, very much aware of why this Malaysian plane was brought down but is also quite culpably as guilty as hell himself in that tragedy.

 

Since from my own perceptive observations of him and to liberally paraphrase the words of William Shakespeare relative to Cameron’s hysterical lambasting of Vladimir Putin – pure acerbic vitriol coming from someone that ostensibly would like for us to believe that he wasn’t involved, and therefore if he’s really as innocent as he self-righteously makes himself out to be couldn’t possibly have known with any certainty what caused that plane to crash, as no temporary causal inquiry let alone any official and independent investigation has yet been convened or carried out to determine the reason for the plane crashing – conduct that were the Malaysian authorities justifiably and understandably to indulge in as it’s their national airline that’s implicated in this mystery after all but clearly haven’t done so, because they’re behaving in a measured, more mature, responsible and civilized manner than David Cameron, for all his privileged background and posh airs, is manifestly incapable of, leads me to accusatorily conclude that: “Methinks the lad doth protest too much!” Which is always a sure-fire indication and dependable guide of personal guilt. Quad erat demonstrandum!

 

However, the likely possibility of David Cameron and his lot, just as was the case with Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and their lot, ending up anytime soon if ever before the International Criminal Court (ICC) in the Hague that is itself generically biased and corrupt because it intentionally and exclusively – as it’s noticeably a puppet of the principal western countries and their governments like the United States for example, which by the way isn’t a signatory to the treaty that set up the ICC and resolutely refuses to sign that treaty or become a member of that court and therefore shouldn’t even be playing any part in the ICC’s deliberations yet significantly and quite disproportionally relative even to those countries that are signed up members does so – arraigns and prosecutes only non-white and most specifically Black so-called perpetrators of war crimes or crimes against humanity; but never white Caucasian ones.

 

And besides Adrian Fulford: the senior British Appeals Court judge secretly cleared of allegations relating to British Establishment paedophilia that occurred on an industrial scale during the 1980s and subsequently in a report whose investigation was carried out by another senior member of the British judiciary, Brian Kerr – how’s that for incestuous conduct? – but whose findings have officially on government diktat not been disclosed, or are they available to the British public, bona fide researchers, investigative journalists, the alleged victims, or anyone else for that matter – and that includes requests under the Freedom of Information Act – no one in fact except for a few select members of David Cameron’s inner Cabal, is himself – Adrian Fulford I’m referring to – an appointed British judge to the ICC. And who put him there? In case you didn’t know, that appointment was made by Tony Blair, the consummate lying mass murderer of modern times, and who is still with disdainful impunity freely at large. And as the Americans are fond of saying, work the maths out for yourselves; as the endemic corruption and mindboggling malfeasance involved and which still goes on in Whitehall and Westminster stink to high heaven! And if you think that these bastards and their counterparts across the Pond in the USA wouldn’t cynically bring down a plane for their own sick and perverse ends and lyingly shift the blame onto others they don’t like, envy or even fear, then think again.

 

A Malaysian passenger airline crashes on the border between Eastern Ukraine and the Russian Federation – a conflict zone that sensibly airlines eschewed for obvious reasons, yet this Malaysian one didn’t with evidence emerging that it was directed by Ukrainian Air Traffic Control not only to change its planned route but also to descend to a lower altitude than it had earlier been flying at.  Why this was done the Ukrainian authorities have so far not given any explanation for this or why the plane was being shadowed by two Ukrainian Air Force Jets. To date the only factual evidence that there is at hand relative to the doomed plane is that this passenger airline crashed.

 

Notwithstanding that though the western media and most particularly the British one without any factual corroboration to back up their spurious claims or insinuations but nevertheless churning out what can best be described as their propagandistic finger pointing, have unleashed an onslaught at Russia for being responsible, they say, for shooting down this plane; this without even attempting to find out let alone establish what the truth is.

 

Hardly surprising, since as far as these so-called western reporters are concerned they’re nothing more than fantasists either too stupid or bone idle to ferret out the facts pertaining to the stories they write or broadcast and are in effect not proper journalist as one would define the term – as it would be a gross calumny to all proper journalists and an unforgivable insult as well to the intelligence of every thinking person, especially in a media era that’s significantly mimicked, inculcated and slavishly followed by our own here in Britain and the rest of Europe, in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s ruling that media operatives are quite legally entitled not only to grossly distort but also make up the news; in other words fabricate and manufacture it to their hearts’ content if they so wish.

 

And being the consummate stenographers that most of them are, and that includes their British counterparts, that’s precisely what they do. Therefore with their paranoia about Russia along with their inbuilt hatred based on their fear of President Vladimir Putin our stenographers have accordingly and unsurprisingly wildly given full vent to their prejudices; and consequently as far as they’re all concerned he is the culprit directly behind and therefore utterly responsible this Malaysian airline crash; or more significant from their point of view as well its shooting down.

 

But hang on a minute – Cui Bono? Who actually benefits in this western propaganda war vis-à-vis Ukraine, where the Malaysian plane just conveniently happened to crash, if the plane was really shot down? Certainly not Russia or President Putin particularly. And let’s not forget that the United States has an extensive track record as well as proven form in the premeditated and politically motivated shooting down with the attendant loss of life of all those on board relative passenger airlines; and it doesn’t just stop there. As these highly criminal decisions on the part of the United States together with numerous false flag operations in the process and worst still with the subsequent blame for what the US did dishonestly and quite barefacedly shunted onto the shoulders of others that had nothing at all to do with these murderous activities stem from the very top of the US political and military power structure. And here are just a few examples of precisely what I mean.

 

A scheduled Cubana Flight 455 flying from Barbados to Jamaica in October 1976 and with a number of Barbadian students returning to their medical training courses at the University of the West Indie blown out of the sky off the coast of Barbados and shortly after the aircraft had taken off from Grantley Adams International Airport on the island; everyone on board killed. Luis Poseda Carriles a CIA operative was responsible for this massacre. Quite cockily he even openly boasted of this and several of his other murderous exploits but was nevertheless freely and openly allowed, with the protection of the US government, to live in Florida.

 

Scheduled Iranian passenger Flight 655 savagely shot down over the Strait of Hormuz on the 3 July 1988 by the United States warship USS Vincennes that was illegally operating in Iranian waters and from where it fired its missile that brought down that plane. The ship’s captain who knew that the plane was a civilian passenger airline, as its intercepted and listened to broadcast frequencies to the air traffic controls that it was routinely in touch with unmistakably indicated that it was a civilian plane, nevertheless evidently acting on orders sadistically went ahead and shot it down killing all 290 passengers and crew, among whom were several children. Later in grateful appreciation by the Pentagon for what he did the Vincennes captain was promoted and honoured, as were the members of his crew.

 

Operation Northwoods - In 1962 the United States Joint Chiefs of Staff desperately wanted to invade Fidel Castro’s Cuba so they devised a shocking plan to deliberately stage terror attacks, bomb American ships and sabotage others; have “friendly” Cubans invade Guantanamo Bay, fake a shoot down of a civilian airline, sink a boatload of Cuban refugees heading for the USA and additionally fake the shoot down of a US fighter jet – all of which would be falsely blamed on Cuba so as to justify an American invasion of that Caribbean island. And it didn’t matter in the least to these sick Pentagon psychos how many thousands of Americans and Cubans would have dies had President Kennedy authorised the plan.

 

Allied false flags that were associated with Operation Northwoods were: Operation Mongoose; Operation Bingo; Operation Dirty Trick: this was to blame Fidel Castro and Cuba – like the US and the Pentagon are now doing with President Vladimir Putin and Russia over the Malaysian plane – if the 1962 US Mercury manned space flight carrying John Glenn crashed. Déjà vu or what? The wording of that sinister plot read: “The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that should the Mercury manned orbit fail, the fault lies with the communists [in Cuba] et al. This is to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans.”

 

Even after General Lemnitzer had lost his job as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff the other Joint Chiefs of Staff still blithely carried on planning false flag pretext operations. One of these abhorrent suggestions included covert attacks on Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago and falsely blaming these on Cuba. As members of the Commonwealth these attacks on Jamaica, Trinidad and Tobago - also OAS members - the sick perpetrators of these plots went on could be used to incite the people of the UK into supporting an all out war against Fidel Castro and Cuba. Well, it’s obvious that vis-à-vis David Cameron’s Britain in 2014 as similarly occurred in 2003 under Tony Blair nothing has changed. And there’s more of this sort of thing on the part of the USA and its vassal states, notably the United Kingdom. Therefore one shouldn’t be that surprised in view of the above and much more besides that the recent and seemingly inexplicable downing - well they would say that wouldn’t they? - of the Malaysian passenger plane fits quite well into the US’s category of false flag operations.

 

Furthermore, Ukraine is absolutely fertile territory for the United States to carry out such false flag operations with utter impunity and then rather dishonestly as it has repeatedly done in the past blame them on others, since apart from having a comprehensive and unquestioning control of the puppet government of hardcore and loathsome Nazis in Kiev, the authorities there aren’t against embarking on some likeminded and freelance, false flag operations of their own. For in 2001 a Russian passenger airline travelling from Tel Aviv in Israel to Moscow was shot down by the Ukrainian military; yet in spite of independent air crash investigators having decisively concluded that the Ukrainians were at fault the Kiev authorities and the military still refused to accept that they had anything to do with the downing of that plane. So why should anyone trust then now relative to the downing of the Malaysian passenger plane lost over East Ukraine; an area where the Kiev authorities have been quite indiscriminately shelling civilian areas as well as sadistically killing its own citizens? So here’s my gut feeling about what has most probably occurred relative to this Malaysian passenger airline.

 

The United States just recently imposed a new batch of sanctions against Russia, sanctions that corporate businesses in the European Union together with some governments there as well and even several corporations in the United States that have lucrative business ties with Russia and don’t want and are therefore dead set against, as they rather sensibly know that these sanctions will be quite damaging to their business interests in the shot, medium and long-term; yet for all that the incumbent US administration, Congress, the Zionist-Nazi neocons of the likes of John McCain and Victoria Nuland, an entrenched fascist US State Department – nothing at all new there – and quite significantly the Military Industrial Complex, together with the rabid career warmongers in the Pentagon – all of them for purely dogmatic political reasons but who were skilfully outmanoeuvred by Russia and the Crimean people and consequently had their prime hopes of corralling not only Ukraine itself but also the prized asset of Crimea into the fold of the NARSISIES, only to have these humiliatingly and permanently dashed with the Crimean peoples’ wish to return home to Russia.

 

A situation made even worst for these regime change jerks when the people of Eastern Ukraine in the wake of the west’s instigated putsch in Kiev decided that they no longer wanted a unitary Ukraine in which they were considerably and intentionally marginalized but if expected to stay in an kind of association with Ukraine at all, then this had to be one where they had far greater autonomy over their lives, future and their land and doing so within the legalized and binding fabric of a federal Ukraine, take or leave it situation, and most definitely not the unsatisfactory unitary state from which they are comprehensively shut out. Naturally this hasn’t gone down at all well with the United States and its subordinate vassal EU states whose so-called leaders like the feckless, feral and highly immature purported adults that they are but who quite obviously haven’t grown up, in vengeful response are persistently and rather idiotically doing everything that they possibly can - including committing mass murder, in addition to what they’ve already been sanctioning their obsequious placement man Petro Poroshenko to do against the people of Eastern Ukraine – to not only punish Russia but also inconvenience it globally as much as they can.

 

So with stubborn home-grown as well as European Union opposition to the new round of US sanctions against Russia quite evident in the White House, the US unwilling to back down for fear of losing face in the west and globally as well – as if anyone other than the US its vassal states like the UK and satrapies really gives a toss about that -  had to do something to rein in this aforesaid opposition and also spectacularly embark on an enterprise to jolt the attention of the rest of the world, grab the news headlines and simultaneously drag the USA’s EU vassal states very reluctant to go along with these new sanctions against Russia, on purely commercial grounds, fully onboard. And what better way with its huge expertise and past form in blowing up passenger airline s out of the sky than for the US, employing and implementing a carefully orchestrated and utterly malign false flag, to achieve its sick political and propagandistic goals.

 

We already know that apart from its ever loyal and utterly unprincipled Blackwater killers the United States has other western mercenaries and equally sadistic murderers operating freely in the Ukraine in addition to the barbarous home-grown, Ukrainian Nazis they’re also regularly using to create mayhem in Ukraine, just as the ironically and self-righteously referred to Land of the Free and Home of the Brave has customarily done elsewhere and even on an industrial scale globally, and still carries on doing.

 

Non-white lives let alone the lost of them altogether anywhere, even at home in the US, don’t matter to the decision makers in Washington or the Pentagon; however white Caucasian ones do immeasurably. So what better way to let loose the western media dogs of war - particularly those located in the Rupert Murdoch’s pooch-house and correspondingly the so-called liberal media organs like the equally despicable Guardian and Independent newspapers – than to at the same time manipulate an easily manipulative and largely gullible western and particularly US and British public by premeditatedly, sickeningly and quite loathsomely sacrificing the lives of a number of white Caucasians on a passenger airline flying from a western destination, across Eastern Ukraine  and next to the Russian border. Then intentionally, lyingly and vociferously attributing the plane’s explosive crash to be the result of its downing by a sophisticated surface to air missile fired either by the Russians or their alleged Ukrainian separatist surrogates at the specific behest of President Putin.

 

That effectively done, then gleefully watch as the attendant hostility and opprobrium generated among westerners and even elsewhere across the globe that this strident, vitriolic and concerted propaganda campaign by the western media has fulsomely engendered and actively encouraged do their dirty work for them. Principally by being a rather sure-fire way to manipulatively whip up anti-Russian sentiment especially in the west, and force unenthusiastic US European Union vassal states to immediately rescind their earlier opposition to the latest round of United States sanctions against Russia and in return enthusiastically jump on board that specific but up until then moribund US bandwagon.

 

And a clear give-away that the downing of that Malaysian plane was a calculated and last-ditch United States instigation to quite decisively swing matters in its favour, is the break-neck speed that David Cameron – fast developing into a complicit mass murderer and quite embarrassingly as well an equally obsequious asshole to everything USA, as Tony Blair evidently was and still is – hurriedly convened COBRA, which was specifically set up and is only tasked to deal with genuine threats to the UK’s national security.

 

So how the fuck then does the evidently tragic loss, but nevertheless in assumed circumstances which as yet presumably nobody knows for sure what really happened that caused that aircraft to crash, of a Malaysian passenger airline routinely flying over some other state’s airspace and literally thousands of miles away from the UK fit, even tenuously, into the category of being a dire threat to Britain’s national security to warrant David Cameron convening and emergency session of COBRA and actually chairing that meeting himself? Sure beats the hell out of me in terms of crass and consummate illogicality and puzzlement I must say; unless, that is, there is something that David is party or privy to which the rest of us mere citizens don’t know.

 

So the way that I see it there can only be one of two possible reasons for David Cameron acting in this way. The first is that he’s globally grandstanding – nothing new in that regard where our PM is concerned as like every post World War II, UK prime minister he preposterously likes to push above his weight – while intentionally at the same time pouring fuel onto the anti-Russian conflagration flaring up in the west. The second and most likely reason, if indeed the plane was shot down, is that David Cameron – who like all British prime ministers again post World War II have been physically joined like inseparable twins at the hip relative to most things USA but particularly that country’s ghastly foreign policies – is a complicit mass murderer who with the Americans is deeply implicated in this completely loathsome, pro-American and intentionally carried out catastrophe; and like all those who’re culpable of serious criminal activities is now essaying to deflect attention away from himself by calculatingly covering his criminal ass. And in my straightforward opinion that’s where the real investigation, and most particularly so from a British perspective since David Cameron is our Prime Minister, should start.

 

And do I believe that David Cameron is culpable in relation to the downing of this Malaysian passenger aircraft? Yes! I most certainly do, as his abject fawning to the United States makes him ideal for the task. Just as Tony Blair was similarly, deeply and complicitly involved with the Americans as well in their joint and felonious saga which took Britain illegally into a war with Iraq and led to its subsequent invasion of that country in 2003.

 

Now if you can come up with a more convincing or logical explanation than my own for David Cameron’s non-involvement in that Malaysian plane crash I’d certainly like to hear it; but it’ll have to be exceptionally good to sway me to your point of view. Because simply taking at face value the well-established and notorious pattern of empty words coming from known criminal western leaders, their governments, legislators, the present day crop of sociopathic and utterly warmongering military top brass, or the sycophantic lapdog media assholes that suck up to all of them and unchecked practically verbatim report everything they say to them as the Gospel truth puts you squarely, I believe, in the same bracket as these people.

 

Individuals that see nothing wrong in the least in happily abusing even the likes of you for their own perverse ends by contemptuously, for example, grossly invading at will your privacy then when they’re caught out and exposed for doing so incredibly brass neck and quite risibly in the process successfully persuade you that they’re doing you a great big favour by acting this way, as it’s all being done in the name of national security and for your own personal protection; so you’ve nothing to worry about. And you fall for it hook line and sinker every time just as they know you will. What brainless chumps you are! Unable even to see that the tragic downing of that Malaysian passenger flight with the deaths of all on board is just the latest example among many others of these sorts of dastardly acts that their sick perpetrators treat like a violent video game and together with their supine supporters cynically brand as politics.

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Friday 18 july 2014 5 18 /07 /Jul /2014 14:44

 

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

The protracted and noticeably acerbic vilification compounded by the intense, utterly one-sided, evidently damagingly and completely misleading, propagandistic portrayal in the Israeli and western media – hardly surprising to anyone with a solitary functioning brain in his or her head, since both these media are owned, extraordinarily and conspicuously influenced by, as well as totally controlled and exclusively run by those who’re either of Yiddish backgrounds or are otherwise closely aligned with them – that the three Israeli youths, even though one of them was at the outset said to be an American citizen, found dead in the West Bank were murdered by Hamas.

 

Par for the course really when it comes to this sort of unsubstantiated, accusatory and vitriolic finger pointing by these absolutely loathsome, obsessively paranoid and unbelievably perverse criminals, who’re no strangers to this kind of skulduggery themselves, whenever they want to draw attention to themselves, feel their criminal objectives aren’t being given the prominence in the western media that they deserve, or suspect that they’re losing the rational argument for their own sick behaviour and need to redress that situation.

 

For let’s face facts; any kind of unity or public demonstration of it among the Palestinians was always going to be like a red rag to a bull where the imposed rulers and vicious occupiers of the discernibly racist, apartheid and colonial entity of Israel were concerned; and like many of their European kith and kin, several of whom were ironically German, the attractive but rather twisted and immoral concept of a Greater Israel, not dissimilar to that of a Greater Germany - or as their 1930s era and close Germans relations publicly called it Lebensraum - was always going to be an appealing proposition to these utterly distasteful Nazi Jews that have taken over Palestine and, in the concerted process that they’ve barbarically employed, wilfully usurped the ancestral rights along with every shred of dignity and common humanity that the Palestinians, to whom this land belong, are lawfully and morally entitled to; and what’s even more sickening about all this, doing so under the laughable, erroneous and utterly insufferable pretext that they are the ancient owners of Palestine.

 

The original Jews, if you don’t mine, and Semites no less; when they bloody well aren’t but are in effect white Caucasian Europeans who’re quite noticeably the biological and incestuously inbred descendants of the white European race who chose to convert to Judaism; not dissimilar to other members of their white kith and kin who also made their own conversion but did so in respect of Christianity; and thus their ludicrously held on to, dishonestly stated and propagated belief that Palestine and much of the Middle East therefore belong to them is as credible as one stating, and really believing it too, that the original Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians or Americans, for example, were similarly white and Caucasian. Or likewise that the pharaohs of Egypt were all Arabs and the Incas and Aztecs were Spanish or Portuguese. And all this on the asininely construed assumption that because those who now totally control the territories where the blood descendants of white Caucasian settlers and or interlopers, or their Arab counterparts now have full demographic sway the situation was always as it currently is; when obviously it was not.

 

Archaeology will and demonstrably does show that Jews did live in Palestine in Biblical times and I for one don’t question that nor do I suspect that any other equally informed person on this particular subject would but it’s a pretty safe bet that Jews who are neither a biological, ethnic, racial or homogenous group of people anymore than Christians are, since the term Christian or Jew signifies the religion of the individual and not their race or place of origin. I’m a Christian, as is the Pope and the Archbishop of Canterbury, but while my ancestral background is British of Afro-Caribbean heritage the Pope is Argentinean of Italian background and the Archbishop of Canterbury is a white Brit and both men, unlike me are white Caucasian. And who would’ve known if they saw them together and weren’t conversant with the facts, that Boris Johnson the incumbent Mayor of London is Jewish while Claudia Schiffer - the famous German model who like Boris Johnson is blue-eyed and blonde-haired - isn’t; yet they’re both unmistakably white Caucasian and European.

 

So frankly, in my opinion, it’s utter crap for white Caucasian European that practise Judaism to arrogate and arrogantly assign to themselves an exclusive and even an exceptionalist religious status that manifestly doesn’t have any logical or credible legitimacy to it, since apart from the demonstration that I’ve given above one isn’t born with a religion indelibly imprinted in their genetic DNA in same way that they are with a specific skin colour for example that they can’t change, as religion is a concept or belief that’s assiduously indoctrinated into us by our parents, guardians or even the society which we were involuntarily, from the infant’s perspective, born into and done so either by foul or fair means.

 

And while in some enlightened societies it’s possible for the followers of a religion into which they were indoctrinated from babyhood to convert to another religion of their informed choice or even give up religion altogether, this isn’t always possible or even a feasible option however much the individual concerned might want to do so. The scandalous case of the Sudanese lady who was born into an Islamic family, freely chose from reciprocal love to marry the man of her choice and actually did so – which should unquestionably have been her inalienable right to do so – yet ended up being sentenced to death by hanging for making her own informed choice on how she wanted to live her own life with the man she loved. The parents of John F. Kerry, the incumbent US Foreign Secretary whose parents were both white Causation European Jews that fled to the United States to escape the European holocaust but on arriving in the US discerning how acute anti-Jewish sentiments in the United States were passed themselves off as Christian.

 

It was a falsehood, undoubtedly devised for their own self-preservation, but which they carried on for quite some considerable time, and successfully remained undetected while doing so. As a matter of fact it wasn’t until John was well into his adulthood that his parents, and even then seemingly reluctantly so, told him and other family members of the truth; that the Kerrys - who like numerous other east European refugees to the United States and other countries in the west re-invented themselves and in the process assumed new names, typically with an Anglo-Saxon flavour, to appear acceptable to the host citizens and other established residents of the countries they’d fled, something that was particularly commonplace among those that were adherents of Judaism - hadn’t always been the Christians they’d made themselves out to be, and furthermore had dishonestly led their own family to think that they were.

 

The globally iconic Muhammad Ali - who I love to bits, have always idolized and will carry on doing so until I draw my last breath here on earth - was, as the whole world knows, given the name Cassius Clay at birth and subsequent to that brought up as a Christian. However, during his professional boxing career he changed not only his given name but his religion as well and became a Muslim. What’s wrong with that I can hear you say - nothing whatsoever at all; and where are you going with that argument you persist? Well here’s my argument, the undeniably Great Muhammad Ali who made that informed decision, can at anytime he wish change back to Christianity, embrace some other religion of his preference or simply decide not to have any religion at all. But whatever this great man does, and whatever religion or none that he chooses Muhammad Ali will proudly, enduringly, biologically and most definitely in terms of his race remain a BLACKMAN. Get where I’m coming? That is a fact of nature and nothing that he or anyone else of whatever race they are can change; any more than we could have decided who our biological parents were, or what race they should have belonged to.

 

And just as any white Caucasian male or female can embrace the faith of Rastafarianism and become as devout as any individual can get relative to that faith, he or she while able to assume the citizenship of the country where the Rastafarian religion was born - namely Jamaica; or opt for that of another Caribbean country come to that – and literally take on all the characteristics of dress, manner of speech, dance, culture, music and all the rest of it that’s directly and also universally associated with what’s distinctively and unreservedly a Caribbean way of life, there is nevertheless one thing that that white Caucasian cannot - no matter how much he or she does identify with the Caribbean and Rastafarianism – become, and that is to be an Afro-Caribbean; since that is something that is permanently encased in one’s genetic DNA and racial profile.

 

So while my iconic hero Muhammad Ali is the exemplary Muslim he has become and clearly continues to be, his voluntary change of religion didn’t suddenly make him an Arab, or could it have done simply because the originator of Islam happened to be an Arab. Likewise it would have been utterly ridiculous for Muhammad Ali or any other such black convert to the Islamic faith to suddenly deny their black African ancestry and ludicrously start classifying themselves exclusively as Arabs; but even more preposterously claim that they are the direct descendants of the originators and earliest practitioners of Islam and, therefore, have an exclusive as well as a sacred duty coupled with the unchallengeable right to sequester Islam as solely their own and to do with it whatever they please. A state of affairs that not only makes Islam and themselves synonymous with each other but similarly grants them the exclusive rights and privileges to as well as the sole ownership of the lands where Islam was first created and established, and now de facto belong to themselves alone.

 

Yet this is the asinine view that white Caucasian and risibly and undeniably the descendants of Europeans who converted to Judaism ludicrously have in respect of that faith, and what’s more everything that’s constructively linked to that religion. But there’s one sure bet and it’s this that whatever archaeological finds or information bona fide archaeologists come up with there sure as hell will never be anything that’s already discovered or likely to be in the future which will ever substantiate the dubious and rather dishonest claims and pretentions of Jews from Europe that the ancient and de facto the original Jews who unquestionably lived, worked and practised their religion in the Palestine area were somehow white Caucasian and European in nature; and because Palestine and its adjoining areas were their stomping ground this reality consequently means that these white Caucasian and quite distinctly European imposters have a compelling, justifiable, legitimate and unchallengeable claim to these ancient Biblical lands. For to concede that that bizarre and illogical assumption has any credibility whatsoever to it, one might as well go the whole hogs and assert that the Arabs – who now control Egypt having usurped that part of North Africa from its indigenous African population in the same way as white Caucasians did relative to the Aborigines in Australia and are now likewise the majority population in that country – were the Pharaohs of Egypt and had produced the dynastic line that ruled that land for millennia.

 

We also know and the late and renowned Professor Basil Davidson in his brilliant Africa series reported that white Caucasian Europeans who first came across iconic statutes like the Sphinx with corroborative evidence that these were all the work of Black Africans, unable to come to terms with or rein in their bigotry that Blacks were savage beasts and consequently couldn’t be responsible for anything remotely like these pieces of work – a similar view they touted when they came across the ruins of the quite ancient Kingdom of Zimbabwe, claiming that it was the remains of a lost white civilization, and so the list goes on; yet find no contradiction in having the priceless and exquisitely crafted Nubian Diamond (not a bad piece of work coming as it did from Niggers who were supposedly savage and incapable of any such thing, eh?) stolen by the British (and still kept in their thieving hands) from the distinctly ancient and African Empire of Nubia, which is incontestably the progenitor of all the Egyptian Pharaohs, as part of the British Crown Jewels securely stored away in the Tower of London..

 

And what do you think these bloody laughable and dishonest white Caucasian Europeans did to get around their ingrained prejudices vis-à-vis the Egyptian Sphinx? Fully conversant with the fact that all sculptors, artists, painters and the like instinctively fashion their subjects in the likeness of themselves or the people that they came from – a practice still prevalent to this day, and even so with children – and moreover that the Sphinx statue had all the physical hallmarks about it equivalent to those of your average Black African, most predominantly so the broad as dissimilar from the pinched European or other racial noses, since the sculptor or sculptors were evidently African, these rather detestable, white Caucasian European, professed archaeologists and Egyptologists unintelligibly incapable of recognizing as well as totally unwilling to face up to the truth of what they saw before their very own eyes, instead opted for deception on a grand scale. The nose of the Sphinx was wilfully destroyed and the resultant damage then circulated by these blatant and pathological liars throughout western academia as the work of weathering.

 

The first and only such case that I know of, if one were to use the crap disseminated by these white liars, of weathering being so selective in what it wears away particularly when the object in question has been standing in the identical location for millennia. Just as well that the black sculptors of the Sphinx didn’t include a penis for that mythical creature in their masterpiece, as with the discernible penis-envy that white Caucasian males generally have vis-à-vis that part of the Blackman’s anatomy - as was markedly shown throughout the notorious lynching of Black males in the American Deep South and elsewhere in the white Caucasian world for instance when prior to slaughtering their black victims these sick, white bastards without fail and with consummate relish always viciously set about dismembering these hapless men – it’s a sure bet that not only the sphinx’s Negroid nose but also it’s Black penis would have been similarly mutilated. Ouch!!

 

So don’t be at all surprised when these white Caucasian and distinctly Yiddish archaeologists together with their toadying apologists start producing so-called proof of their lot – not Jews per se, which is not at all in doubt here, but their own white Caucasian and distinctly European kind – having previously lived in Palestine and its adjacent regions and therefore everything that these white Caucasian Europeans covet de facto belongs exclusively to THEM as “God’s chosen people!” Contradictorily to this point of view we have the Ethiopian Falashas – black as the Ace of Spades and likewise Jews, coming from a country where not only the Star of David but also everything that’s positively associated with it, not World War II or Europe’s holocaust of course as that’s all white Caucasian and distinctly European, are deeply and have been for millennia embedded in the Falashas’ culture and religious rituals – and whose close links with Judaism perceptibly predates anything and everything that these Zionist Yiddish prats falsely lay claim to; but you wouldn’t know any of this would you, listening to these holocaust brain dead, deeply delusional, and feral mad men and women out of Europe.

 

Therefore the Stockholm Syndrome equivalent that these post European holocaust victims - for lack of a better description to define them, while totally inexcusable is, when observed closely, unexpected I supposed especially in its ferocity towards the Palestinians who’ve not done them anything, since Stockholm Syndrome sufferers rarely if ever turn on those who have mistreated them, and on the contrary often strongly identify and typically personally empathize with them as well. That’s why these white European Jews that have appropriated Palestine and aberrantly treat the indigenous Palestinian population in the manner they do abhorrently, to any intelligent person, contentedly tolerate in 2014 the insulting behaviour of both the rulers and people of the Baltic States - members of both the EU and the NARSISIES – that proudly on an annual basis celebrate their Waffen SS, Nazi wartime past; boast openly that unlike Germany they were able to eradicate all their Jews; and who until just recently banned the establishment of synagogues anywhere on their territory.

 

Yet the Palestinians who had nothing at all to do with what went on in Europe and certainly not the plight of these white Caucasian Jews, or for that matter their parents and grandparents from Europe - since their hapless situation in Europe’s holocaust was as a direct consequence of the deliberate actions of their own white European kith and kin – are being made to pay the price for something of which they’re entirely blameless, while the Jewish victims and their alleged survivors of World War II along with the premeditated perpetrators of their massacre and the Final Solution intended for them happily, opportunely and conspiratorially line up together to devastatingly inflict whatever misery they can on the people of Palestine, as in the process they misleadingly, and rather successfully too, deflect their collaborative and repulsive wrongdoings from the short-lived memories of a world all too eager to forget. Which prompts the obvious question; if these European Jews can kiss and make up with those who murdered them in their millions, why the hell then do they take their sick revenge out on those that weren’t responsible for what happened to them?

 

When I first heard of the kidnapping of these teenagers alarm bells instinctively went off in my head and my first reaction then, and still is, that it was another Israeli false flag; since these rather sick bastards aren’t above killing their own - and there’s a plethora of solid documentary evidence to substantiate this point of view – to get their way while accusing and even pinning the blame for their criminal activities on others who they don’t like in order to have public and even international opinion, in total conjunction with the control that these Yiddish Nazis wield over the western media discriminatorily vilify total innocents for acts of barbarity they didn’t commit and which were comprehensively and exclusively the work of these feral elements of humanity that run Israel and who support its existence. And consequently what happened in the West Bank is just another example of this kind of repellent behaviour.

 

Later on I shall give a few examples of the multiple cases, too numerous to detail in any one article of the false flags operations that consecutive Israeli regimes and their several state run authorities across the board have premeditatedly and quite sickeningly carried out not only in the Middle East but also globally; and that includes Europe and the USA. However, before one gets too carried away in their sympathy for these youths that the Israelis say, and the western media accordingly enthusiastically mimics this view, were killed by Hamas, let’s first get some serious perspective in place relative to what has actually gone on.

 

Since 2000 some 1,600 Palestinians youths comprising young children and babies have been systematically killed by Israeli state operations alone but for which no one has been brought to book and the western media don’t think is worthy of reporting on. Furthermore, not long before these Israeli youths were allegedly kidnapped and murdered, two unarmed Palestinian youths were brutally shot down in cold blood in an empty street and despite CCTV footage showing quite clearly that they weren’t doing anything untoward the misnomer named Israeli Defence Force said that their extremely heavily armed, completely masked and highly protected soldiers were mortally in danger for their lives and therefore were left with no option but to shoot to kill these Palestinian youths that were rioting in the street.

 

Yet no CCTV footage showed any rioting having taken place, and apart from RT not a single western received, media broadcaster bothered to report this tragedy or its accompanying lies. And all because these killers know they can operate with absolute impunity and, additionally, have blanket immunity granted to them by their regime and the Israeli courts to quite literally do as they please. And even following the wide response by the western media after the killing of the three Israeli youths two Palestinians youths: one in Jerusalem the other in the West Bank were also kidnapped and killed, ostensibly by Israeli revenge seekers, but you can readily forgive yourself for not knowing that these specific incidents did occur, since there has been no reporting of them in the western media. For as usual it’s only the lives of white Caucasians and no one else that matters.

 

And rather sickeningly adding his contribution to this asymmetrical, propagandistic discourse we have President Obama saying that as a father he can readily empathize with the anguish of the parents of these Israeli youths; oh really Barack? What then about the parents of the kids - not just youths but also toddlers and babies - killed by your authorized killer drone strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Iraq and elsewhere in the Global South; don’t they also qualify for a mea culpa from you? But apparently not; since like you, Congress, the US Supreme Court and the rest of you quite clearly must kowtow to the all powerful Yiddish Nazi lobby in the US and across the western world.

 

Benjamin Netanyahu: a classic sociopath, if ever there was one - needed an excuse to scupper the recent burying of the political hatchet between Hamas and Fatah and anything that would paint unity among Arabs as being a constructive force must be destroyed. We see this mindset quite evident in his call for the recognition of the autonomous region of Kurdistan in Iraq to be recognized as an independent state because his outlook like that of western leaders is that failed states in the Arab world are fine as they then don’t pose any threat to the hegemony of the US, its western satrapies and, of course, its attack dog Israel. And together with the western media they collaboratively embrace and implement the policy that information warfare even against western citizens and the global public generally is acceptable too; since it enforces the required narrative even when what is being said doesn’t match up with reality, and is in effect an Alice in Wonderland scenario.

 

Anyway here are some of the more notorious – which really isn’t saying much as they’re all loathsome – false flags conducted by successive Israeli regimes in close collaboration with the United States and the rest of the west. Research and check them out for yourself.

 

The Lavon Affair of July 1954. Israeli bombings in Cairo and Alexandria with attacks on US interests and properties there, then blaming these attacks on the opponents of President Nasser. The primary purpose to drastically undermine the then Nasser government, get the US and UK to distance themselves from him and effectively bring about regime change in Egypt. The real culprits of these attacks, Mossad.

 

Direct Action attack on the Goldenberg Deli in Paris on the 9 August 1982. Six people killed and 22 injured. The leader of that murderous operation was Jean-Marc Rouillon, code name “Sebas” who was a Mossad operative, and would you believe it, the owner and the principal customers of that deli were French Jews. But then that was the entire purpose of the operation; to murder Jews and blame others for their deaths; how sick can one get? That’s like you killing your parents or grandparents and other close relatives just to incriminate those you didn’t like, or had a perverse obsession about.

 

October 1976. Mossad kidnapped two West German students: Brigitte Schultz and Thomas Reuter in Paris, planted clues and then made anonymous phone calls to make it appear that a Bavarian Nazi group was responsible. Meanwhile, the abducted Germans were secretly flown to Israel, drugged, tortured and coerced into making false confessions of complicity with the PLO; then anonymously incarcerated in an Israeli prison.

 

Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi was openly accused in the early months of the presidency of Ronald Reagan of having dispatched a Libyan hit squad to the USA to kill Reagan. The source of this claim was, you guessed it, Israel. Then with the enthusiastic and unquestioning support of the Yiddish media in the US full coverage was given to this blatant and manufactured lie by Israel, but it nevertheless succeeded in inflaming public feelings against Libya and Muammar Gaddafi that carried on right up to his execution by the USA and other western countries following their attack on Libya three years ago. The originator of that lying story was Manucher Ghorbanifar – an ex Iranian Secret Police (SAVAK) member under the dictatorial Shah and an Iranian Jew – who was a Mossad agent.

 

But even when the Washington Post conceded that the CIA genuinely thought Ghorbanifar to be a liar, the United States media and practically everyone else with influence in that country still carried on with the manufactured lie implanted by Israel but which had the desired and absolutely disastrous consequences for foreign relations between the US and Libya; and whose costs can still be seen in Libya in 2014. The doggy Iraqi dossier that complicit mass murderer Tony Blair dishonestly attached so much importance to, lyingly sold to the House of Commons and the British public as the Gospel Truth and led to Britain illegally attacking and invading Iraq in 2003 also emanated from Israel, something that arch-Zionist Tony Blair KNEW to be a perfidious and premeditatedly concocted lie.

 

Then there was the USS Liberty incident in 1967 when Israel deliberately attacked that United States warship and killed some 34 US servicemen with the singular purpose of dragging the US into the war Israel was waging with its Arab neighbours. But so powerful is the Yiddish lobby in the US, and with so many US Congressmen and other administration officials, as well as the US Supreme Court over the years in the financial pockets of that potent lobby, that successive US administrations, and that includes the incumbent Obama one, have always shied away from revealing the truth, which all of them know, of what actually happened, and that prompted that Israeli attack on the USS Liberty; and instead chosen to hide themselves behind the cover-up that took place and is still going on; in the process cynically and most cruelly denying justice to the dead US Servicemen and their surviving relatives.

 

So do I believe the Israelis are behind the murders of these three youths? I most certainly do; and smelled a rat from the moment their abduction was announced and the fervour with which it was projected and promulgated in the Israeli and western media. Gilad Shalit was captured and held by Hamas for some 5 years and it’s my belief that if Hamas had taken these kids it would have used them as a bargaining chip like they did with Gilad Shalit and not kill them; as to do so wouldn’t have served any purpose whatsoever. Which poses the age-old and rather pertinent question: Cui Bono – who benefits? And the only logical answer to that question is Israel.

 

But two other things also come to mind; these Israeli youths were able at will to roam across the West Bank, something no Palestinian – man, woman or child – can do within their Israeli imposed, Palestinian-US-style reservations much less so that considerable segment of Palestine that these white European settlers have already appropriated from the indigenous Palestinians. And when you’re next inclined to feel or even consider how hard-done-by these Israelis are by these barbaric Palestinians, as is the wont of those of you who like nothing better than being consistently brainwashed by the Yiddish media, because you’re either incapable of or much too lazy to think for yourselves and check out the facts; just remember this one salient one - if only to put matters into their true perspective. Every THREE days on average ONE Palestinian child is murdered by the Israelis.

 

And this doesn’t factor into that particular equation the scores of thousands of Palestinian men and women who routinely have been killed by the Israelis since their occupation of Palestine. For as far as these white European settlers are concerned they are quite willing and prepared to endanger innocent lives – even those of their own kind – as part of their strategy of expanding their vainglorious global influence. In which case why should the lives of three insignificant Yiddish teenagers, alive, matter to the Israeli authorities in the least when by murdering them they immediately become more beneficial to their cause, as they can then effectively become a vital part of the utilization of their rather sick propaganda campaign put to full and devastating effect, knowing that a brainwashed western public, comprehensively aided and abetted by their Yiddish media, will readily swallow every bit of their loathsome garbage.

 

So bearing all that in mind how would you like to be in the shoes of the Palestinians, relative to your own family members, and treated in exactly the same manner? Food for thought wouldn’t you say?

 

Funny, but I don’t recall Khazars – who these white Caucasian, Yiddish European settlers in Palestine largely are and have naturally been descended from themselves – either being Semites – if so where the DNA proof of this? - or even more ludicrous in authentic Biblical terms ever being classified as “God’s Chosen People.” However, there’re two certainties that are indisputable where these European interlopers are concerned, and there are that they’re not only practised fantasists but also a pretty barbaric and loathsome bunch of Zionist-Nazi butchers.

 

For this continued asymmetrical onslaught against Hamas generally, an organization that the Israelis initially created as a foil against Fatah when the latter was a genuine liberation movement under Yasser Arafat and hadn’t become the venally corrupt and bought off traitors of the Palestinian people that it now is, and the residents of Gaza specifically who’re inhumanly being forced to live in what’s basically a grossly overcrowded and open-air concentration camp by their white Caucasian, Zionist-Nazi and Waffen-SS-style prison guards surrounding them everywhere from the territorial enclave of Zionist, apartheid and settler Israel - the only so-called country in the world with no legally defined or constituted borders and frankly wants none.

 

And therefore assiduously eschews having any – is being cynically and premeditatedly conducted because the utterly barbaric and Yiddish Nazis affecting this campaign against the Palestinians and are themselves imbued with the extremist colonialist notion of Lebensraum – as were their Third Reich Nazi mentors and German kith and kin - didn’t like the recent willingness shown by the United States administration to work with a unified Palestinian entity.

 

And particularly so not one that embraced Hamas, which the Zionist-Nazi, mafia-type Dons in charge of the Israeli settler and apartheid regime in Tel Aviv were extremely fearful of and still are – hence the false flag of killing those three Israeli youths and blaming their sadistic murders on Hamas – that any such US and Palestinian overtures and even a rapprochement between them would ultimately lead to real peace and real Israeli borders for the very first time; the very last things that these demented and warmongering, Yiddish-Nazi bastards, purposely entrapped in their grotesquely paranoiac, World War II reparations and massive US-subsidies beneficial and enduring victim comfort zone culture, actually want.

 

And amidst al this misplaced Europe holocaust sympathy that the world, 70 years on, still exclusively doles out to these mass murderers who make the Third Reich Nazi killers look like naughty schoolboys in comparison; it’s being conveniently forgotten against this rather irrational backdrop that Israel has the right to defend itself that it’s Israel that is actually the aggressor and perfidious wrongdoer. For let’s remember that under International Law all oppressed and occupied peoples globally – and not just white Caucasian ones – have the legitimate right to liberate themselves and put an effective end to their oppression by any means at their disposal.

 

This is what Hamas and the Palestinians who genuinely care about restoring their dignity as a people along with their misappropriated homeland and ancestral rights are doing, and very much as it happens against the odds of white Caucasian, European interlopers and their western and even Russian backers obstruction, and from among whose own populations many of these settlers in Palestine have emanated; and since the end of World War II have been systematically occupying most of historic Palestine – a process that’s still ongoing – and with impunity markedly oppressing the entire Palestinian population. And if that doesn’t justify retribution on the part of the Palestinians, then I don’t know what does!

 

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Monday 14 july 2014 1 14 /07 /Jul /2014 17:12

 

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

There’s an old English saying that people quite understandably get judged by the friends that they keep, and in line with that tenet therefore I personally don’t buy the load of crap emanating in belated and unconvincing, lame excuses from the likes of Harriet Harman, Patricia Hewitt, Adrian Fulford and other dubious characters of their ilk within the British Establishment, who now that they’ve been metaphorically caught with their knickers or trousers around their ankles, want to con those of us with functioning brains in our heads that chalk is actually cheese.

 

Well-brought up five year olds instinctively know right from wrong because they’re taught the significance of both these viewpoints in their lives and consequently are likewise positively encouraged and instructed how to eschew the latter; adults who’re prominent and influential in any society, and that should include our own here in Britain, who’re either tasked as elected politicians with framing the country’s laws or as senior judges with upholding, without fear or favour, those very laws, and who as supposedly responsible persons – else they shouldn’t have been appointed to those important posts in the first place – let alone individuals entrusted with holding the aforesaid positions should have known, and furthermore are expected to infinitely know better than any five year old child what’s loathsomely immoral and downright illegal to any right-thinking person that is.

 

And even fantasizing about having sexual intercourse with considerably underage children, who’re no more than babies themselves, much less grotesquely manipulating the law of the land to facilitate such abhorrent conduct is, I believe, beyond the pale; and no genuinely moral person - regardless of what high and mighty position they hold or which hereditary monarch they’re appointed as an advisor to or who conversely hold no such rank or personally wouldn’t care for any such dubious honour or recognition – would conscionably, even in the remotest sense, want to much less openly associate themselves with a collaborative grouping of odious paedophiles – Establishment or otherwise – as the smarmy and euphemistically named PIE – the Paedophile Information Exchange – calls itself, and is generally known as by those who despicably cavort with it, irrespective of its tenuous legal status; but rather would sensibly give it a wide berth.

 

Patricia Hewitt, Harriet Harman, Adrian Fulford and Co clearly didn’t do any of the above as they sensibly should have done and responsible individuals not only in Britain but anywhere else come to that would have expected them to; and as such one is perfectly entitled to ask why not? Yet they’d be among the first, if the boot was on the other foot, to condemn others either engaged in or connected, however loosely, with activities that they personally found abhorrent or even objected to, doing so on the basis that such activities - if they were as transparently so as paedophilia most definitely is - were significantly detrimental in physical, psychological, moral and societal terms to the fabric of the nation as well as the victims involved.

 

And one such example comes readily to mind - knife crime, especially when with that racist mindset of theirs it’s prejudicially, erroneously but exclusively associated with one particular segment of our British community - the Black one! And who’re then collectively as an ethnic group targeted, vilified and severely punished. Not so, however, the white Caucasian, British Establishment, notwithstanding how heinous or multifaceted their individual or collaborative crimes are or who are directly responsible for them. And one only had to observe the raucous baying of MPs in the House of Commons quite recently when the contentious matter of knife murder was uppermost in the news. But they would, wouldn’t they?

 

And it’s also a safe bet from the perspective of these MPs and others of their Establishment ilk that if one of these utterly detested knife wielding adherents, of whatever ethnic group that they belonged to, were to have killed someone, either gratuitously or in a gang fight, in the presence of their close friends who did nothing at all to stop the actual knife wielder but on the contrary were very supportive of his or her actions; and what’s more these loyal or sympathetic friends then resolutely refused to give any evidence to the police against the killer, they’d be instantly arrested for intentionally thwarting a police enquiry and obstructing the course of justice. Or much more likely, simply because of whom they were and where they were at the time of the murder, be likewise charged with being accessories after the fact. And no one needs to acquaint Harriet Harman or Adrian Fulford, who’re both lawyers and him a senior judge as well, about this; as they’re both fully aware of this entrenched legal practice, as does Patricia Hewitt.

 

Yet for all that they quite superciliously expect the rest of us to buy the load of hogwash they pompously and utterly unconvincingly serve up about their connections with PIE, and mixing metaphors don’t want for us to smell let alone observe the demonstrably dead rat that’s in the swill being poured into the pig’s trough - something that in other circumstances as MPs they know a great deal about. And as far as being accessories after the PIE fact, just as would be the case in the aforesaid fictional knife stabbing scenario, these Brains of Britain – I honestly don’t think – don’t even want for the rest of us to go down that particular path as far as they’re personally concerned.

 

How’s that you might well ask relative to their quite hubristic but all the same contemptibly perceived notion of Establishment exceptionalism and indispensability? And while there are many of you who will undoubtedly and even, dare I say, inevitably fall for it because of who these people are coupled with your own stupidity or perhaps naïveté, let me quite candidly and unapologetically say I don’t buy any of that exceptionalist and indispensible crap of theirs, or am I ever likely to.

 

Four year olds are basically babies with no comprehensive knowledge of the world that they’re in; who’re not in any position at all, or do they have the kind of developed mental capabilities to make valued or objective judgments in relation to their personal lives or anything else that’s even tenuously connected to or important to them. Furthermore, they’re nowhere near puberty in physical or emotional terms and wouldn’t have the slightest clue or any discernible grasp of what puberty is even if one were to ludicrously attempt to explain it to them; that’s provided of course that the individual concerned were capable of retaining that child’s miniscule attention span. So how on earth then can these PIE perverts and their Establishment supporters logically emphasize and moreover maintain that by lowering the sexual age of consent to FOUR or even scrapping it altogether society as a whole would benefit significantly, because effectively it would be liberating its children.

 

From what? Their innocence? Because that’s essentially what these paedophiles and their sick apologists would be doing; and I don’t see anything that’s either remotely beneficial or in the least constructive about that. Can you?

 

Brian Kerr exonerated Adrian Fulford in the light of the Daily Mail expose of him on the basis that the accusations against Adrian Fulford were “allegations without substance.” In the given circumstances of that report by Brian Kerr, quite seriously what other outcome could one have expected? And to paraphrase Mandy Rice Davies – who more than most was well aware of the contemptible and contemptuous disingenuousness that the British Establishment has vis-à-vis the ordinary members of the public - Brian Kerr would obviously say that wouldn’t he? Yet neither Brian Kerr nor the Westminster regime - rather understandably from their skewed point of view - has had either the bloody courage or the decency to publish that report that all sensible persons instinctively and with that gut feeling deep inside know was a comprehensive whitewash, both literally – since all the participants other than perhaps apart from the hapless victims were white Caucasian Establishment figures – and metaphorically so.

 

And one would quite reasonably have thought that public interest aside, but nevertheless with such serious, very damaging and utterly revolting allegations circulating extensively about one of our most senior Appeal Court judges that the enshrined and purportedly valued principle of justice not only being done but demonstrably as well seen to have been done – evidently what the likes of Brian Kerr and Adrian Fulford ostensibly like to dupe the rest of us into trustingly believing when it transparently doesn’t impact on their sort - would meticulously have applied and most crucially, publicly seen to have been done in of all cases that of Adrian Fulford. And the fact that neither Brian Kerr, the government nor others within the judiciary didn’t see that it was fit or proper to do so blatantly leaves a number of questions unansered and from my point of view questions the so-called integrity of all those involved.

 

Can’t say I’m surprised though by Brian Kerr’s spurious conclusions, poor man; as I’m not; coming as they do from someone who emanates from a society where an internecine and longstanding civil war there isn’t even recognized as such and is asininely and euphemistically referred to by all an sundry as the “Troubles!” Since it’s likewise the customary conduct of a rather corrupt, secretively appointed, entirely unaccountable, downright hypocritical and an absolute master class of double-standards operatives that run our so-called judicial system. And frankly you’re most welcome to them, as you’re the targeted assholes who sycophantically know your own station in life and “cap-doffingly” suck up to them believing all the claptrap they tell you; and overwhelmingly so because these unelected, unaccountable to the citizenry of our country and prized Establishment jerks are judges. While in return they cynically and disdainfully pull the wool over your eyes, do whatever it is they want to and in the process treat you all with the utmost contempt. And on reflection if you want to know what I really think; it’s that they and you thoroughly deserve each other.

 

I’m absolutely convinced that Elizabeth Butler-Sloss’ conclusions at the end of the so-called enquiry she’s been put in charge of will be identical to those of Brian Kerr, relative to Adrian Fulford: “allegations without substance.” But whatever; doesn’t it make you sit up and think and also have a smug smile in the bargain - those of you who like me don’t give a toss about these feral and in terms of human worth trivial individuals - at their discernible inadequacies, that the only conceivable way - quite palpably sick as it is - that these patronizing, pretentious, self-perceived exceptionalist and indispensible white Caucasian, British Establishment figures, and particularly its male component, can get their rocks off is to screw very vulnerable young children and/or babies?

 

Can’t say I’m the least bit shocked by any of the above, since to those in the know these are the same ineffectual bastards who for several generations now have rather ridiculously but all the same blithely, although somewhat pathetically to observe, been roundly deluding themselves that they’ve successfully and manfully, as the macho males they both see and regard themselves as, proudly fathered the children they either unwittingly didn’t or couldn’t have sired – because they’re unknowingly azospermiacs; shooting blanks in other words – with their clandestinely cuckolding wives more than content to let them erroneously and imaginarily, but oh so haughtily like the chump cuckolds they patently are, carry on sporting and risibly accrediting themselves with the cherished but illusional prestige – relative to themselves anyway – of biological fatherhood.

 

And then, of course, there are those Establishment “men” who’re well aware of their wives’ infidelity, even privately encourage it and welcome the bastard offspring that result, known only to the two of them and perhaps the respective wives’ lovers and amorously produced from these wives’ sexual liaisons. And why? Because the husbands to these wives are closet homosexuals that use marriage and even bogus “fatherhood” – never mind they’re not responsible for the real thing - as a handy guise or subterfuge to publicly conceal the fact that they’re hardcore homosexuals. A most cowardly artifice, in my opinion, on the part of these “men” in what after all is a country where homosexuality and homosexual marriages are quite legal among consenting adults.

 

And research shows that there’s a lot of that about particularly among those of the sexually repressed public schools – both male and female – brigades; that’s why the women that these men intentionally for societal reasons and appearances but often lovelessly marry, are very much complicit in what they do; except for those occasions when their cuckolding enterprises cause them to clandestinely and from the heart go freelance. But if you ask me, both these women and their “men” are one and the same immorally!

 

That’s why you don’t or won’t see these women castigating or walking out on their paedophile men; and why it is too that white Caucasians per se, and of both genders, are exceedingly muted in their condemnations when it comes to criticizing white paedophiles, for fear it’ll be interpreted by other races as a damning indictment of their race, which they ludicrously and totally fallaciously like to self-opinionatedly portray as inherently and exclusively the most civilized on earth and a beacon for others to follow. And that’s not possible to continue doing if you’re forced to admit that you’ve some pretty nasty and horrific skeletons in your cupboard, is it?

 

And with my Afro-Caribbean and brutally enforced slavery ancestry background at the savage hands of these utterly distasteful people, maybe in permitting what’s going on to occur, God is perhaps demonstrating that He also has the same wry sense of humour as I do.

 

For in the days when Britannia ruled the waves these immoral breed of men and women were the same scum that with impunity carried out these very same iniquitous and utterly criminal activities among the so-called natives. Now apart from a few controversial rocks in the South Atlantic referred to as the Falkland Islands and, of course, that southern European one called Gibraltar there’s no substantial, thank God, British Empire left – no matter how many OBEs, CBEs, MBEs or the rest of it that these demented empire loyalists still like doling out to each other; and like the dogs that belonged to Martin (40) and his wife Rebecca Clifton (34) of New Houghton, Derbyshire that ate each other after their owners went off on holiday to Skegness in Lincolnshire and left them unattended, that identically barbarous and feral mindset pervades our white Caucasian, British Establishment and their toadying hangers-on. And what we’re now witnessing, without an empire where these people could give vent to their utterly sick, sexual perversions, are the proverbial chickens, as will the inevitable blowback from their likewise loathsome and criminal foreign policies, coming home to roost.

 

And it’s not just Britain; Australia where many of our country’s much vaunted kith and kin are located and with them having appropriated that massive land from its indigenous Aborigine population, that identically virulent, sick mindset endemic among our own white Caucasian Establishment at home also sadistically affects their Australian counterparts with an Australian District Court Judge - one Garry Neilson - publicly advocating not only paedophilia as such but also untrammelled incestuous relationships between siblings and other close biological family members, emphasizing that just as homosexuality has become legal and is generally acceptable too, in the foreseeable future paedophilia and incest will likewise enjoy the same privileges. No need to ask what he gets up to within his own biological family and possibly too among the kids and other extremely vulnerable underage family members of friends and work colleagues; when he’s not freelancing with children who’re total strangers to him, that is.

 

And when a senior Cabinet minister in the Con-Dem regime of David Cameron and Nick Clegg – Michael Gove, the Education Minister no less, while industriously objecting to any attempt at holding a rigorous and full-scale enquiry of these Establishment criminalities on the basis that what happened then occurred in a different cultural era and therefore we should all get used to it, forget it and move on.

 

Unsurprisingly to me no coverage or criticisms are to be found of Garry Neilson or Michael Gove’s remarks in the western media; but even though I’m absolutely sure that no such sick or utterly insensitive comments would emanate from similar office holders as Michael Gove and Garry Neilson in let’s say Iran, Zimbabwe, Cuba, Venezuela, Syria or Russia, can you imagine  what in marked contrast the furore would be from the west’s political Establishment – the likes of William Hague, John Kerry and Victoria Nuland for example and throughout the entire western corporate media together with their rent-a-mouth pundits – both black and white – if these loathsome comments were coming out of the previously mentioned countries? Boy, we wouldn’t hear the last of it!

 

Which simply and rather categorically goes to show what a lousy bunch of hypocrites and slick double-standards operatives those within our Establishment along with their like-minded ilk that control and work in the western media are, and why too it’s not rocket science to work out why Elizabeth Butler-Sloss - with her own identifiable skeletons of sex abuse cover ups in her particular cupboard - was put in charge of this so-called enquiry, or what her findings will be.

 

And it’s this human detritus that would like to con the rest of the world that they are the Master Race. Give us strength!

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Thursday 10 july 2014 4 10 /07 /Jul /2014 15:52

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

In Britain the law is generally seen as an ass by Establishment figures and the privileged elites and therefore contemptuously treated as a needless inconvenience by them. Hardly surprising then that they conspiratorially and pertinaciously ensure that we have donkeys administering it. Furthermore, the disturbing news - from any objective perspective – that Elizabeth Butler-Sloss is to head the enquiry supposedly tasked with looking into the activities, criminal or otherwise, of a purportedly well-established Establishment paedophile ring that notoriously operated throughout Westminster and the corridors of power within Britain during the 1980s is, in my opinion, an utterly shameless, reprehensible and a most cynical move by those who appointed her with this task, and I don’t mind in the least explicitly and unapologetically saying so.

 

Elizabeth, let’s face facts, couldn’t be any more of an Establishment figure if she or anyone else for that matter essayed for her to be. She’s crucially an ex-member of the British judiciary – itself as unrepresentative of the average British citizen or resident as one could possibly get; currently sits by political appointment rather than by voter election in the House of Lords – even members of the patently corrupt US Senate are periodically elected by adult suffrage and can either be endorsed in or removed from office by the said electorate that put them there in the first place, not those in the House of Lords, Britain’s corresponding upper legislative chamber, and particularly the likes of Elizabeth who very much owe their status predominantly to unaccountable political patronage and accordingly reciprocate their gratitude for receiving it with unquestioning obsequiousness.

 

Additionally, Elizabeth is the sister of Michael Havers: a British Attorney General in the 1980s when this Establishment paedophile ring was in full swing, and who is known to have used his political and legal authority – attorney generals apart from being the principal law officer in England and the UK and personally appointed by the incumbent Prime Minister, are also senior, prominent and highly influential members of both the Cabinet and government of the day – to personally block the prosecution of paedophile and other sex abuse cases perpetrated by Establishment figures, allowing the perpetrators of these acts to get off scot-free and unjustly walk away with their so-called reputations “unblemished.” And like I said earlier Elizabeth Butler-Sloss is his sister.

 

So work out the utterly damaging repercussions of her unsuitable appointment and principal involvement as head of this mooted enquiry – sibling loyalties aside if that’s at all possible – for yourselves, as I’m absolutely sure that you don’t need me to do that for you even if you’ve only a modicum of commonsense to call upon as your own – unless, of course, you’re completely brain dead!

 

Let me in the interim paint a near analogous scenario for you and suggest that a figure like Arthur Scargill was appointed with the same aplomb as those who appointed Elizabeth Butler-Sloss to carry out an official enquiry into and then authorized to propose as a result of it requisite recommendations for reforms to the British Trade Union Movement – something that we all know, as things are in Britain, would never happen in a month of Sundays.

 

But humour me and let’s all pretend it did happen. Instantaneously we would have virulent and the most abusive condemnations of this action from these same Establishment bastards and bitches and the fawning media pundits that drool on their every word vilifying everyone remotely connected with the Scargillesque appointment as sick, perverse, unjust, devoid of all integrity, classified as immoral and viciously painting them as sycophantically pandering to working class vested interests. No such reservations or condemnations, however, when it’s this Establishment lot who are ludicrously tasked with looking into the criminal activities of their own. And why?

 

Because they’re born to or omnipotently divined to be exceptionalist and indispensible to everything they do; something that the rest of us obviously aren’t and will never in their eyes be qualified to be. Elizabeth Butler-Sloss whether she cares to admit it or not has her own personal prejudices like the rest of us; the only difference being that in the rarefied, exceedingly narrow-minded and totally exclusive environment in which she noticeably lives, operates and ensconces herself in it’s one that’s diametrically at odds to how the vast majority of people in Britain live and work, and is like asking a Trappist Monk to hold forth on the problems of pregnancy per se or more specifically one-parenthood culture exclusively on working class council estates, something he knows absolutely nothing about or has any real interest in.

 

So think whatever you want, but it’s my firm belief that this much trumpeted enquiry forced onto the Prime Minister and Home Secretary – that initially neither of them actually wanted– is nothing more that a cynical sop to appease public opinion, while outwardly and fraudulently giving the impression that something is being done, when that is the last thing that either David Cameron or Theresa May want.

 

For if the opposite were the case why appoint a transparently, well-established Establishment figure to investigate people whom she either knows or additionally are friends with; those who’re still alive that is?  And when newspapers like the alleged liberal Guardian emphatically state on its front page that Elizabeth Butler-Sloss is the right person for the job, all that does is to cause me to firmly pinch my nose and hold my breath as one would, if suddenly and uncomfortably confronted with a dead and rotting dog in the road.

 

At the end of the day the Guardian though it deceitfully likes to give the impression that it’s different from the rest of the British media isn’t; and in most respects is worse than the rightwing tabloids, as they don’t make any pretence about what they really are. However, they all of them have one thing in common – they’re deeply and sycophantically embedded with the Establishment, so why would they want to consciously destroy the goose that lays the golden eggs for these so-called journalists who have no concept of what real journalism is all about or the Fourth Estate for that matter? Compliant stenographers the lot of them!

 

What this enquiry desperately needs is not an Establishment figure to overseer it nor anyone with judicial expertise for that matter, but most definitely someone with integrity and commonsense who’ll do the job without fear or favour; and Elizabeth Butler-Sloss with her significant Establishment baggage is not the person for this task, unless it’s to spuriously given credence to what was intended all along.

 

To at best kick these so-called historic acts of paedophilia and other criminality into the long-grass or else with the fulsome help of a compliant media geared up for and quite willing to assist in hoodwinking the British public, also ensure that those criminally responsible will never be brought to book; as the professed enquiry led by Elizabeth Butler-Sloss will ultimately be nothing more than another Establishment and Westminster whitewash. Does Bloody Sunday and Hillsborough come to mind?

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 9 july 2014 3 09 /07 /Jul /2014 16:28

 

By Stanley Collymore

 

 

They talk openly, ardently and seemingly even credibly,

but oh so dishonestly, about moral principles and

how our nation’s children should be protected

from wanton abuse and intentional harm;

yet behind closed doors their personal

actions couldn’t be more different

from their public pronouncements,

with private lives markedly

reeking with the ghastly

ubiquitous stench of

resilient carrion.

 

For these are our Establishment abusers: well

heeled celebrity gropers, sexual abusers,

paedophiles, child-traffickers and

even murderers - who not only

consider themselves to be above the

law but who in many instances, as our

political representatives, ironically

make these same laws from

whose consequences they

then absolve themselves

with explicit and

breath-taking

impunity.

 

Fully aware that any incumbent Home Secretary,

the Home Office, its Senior Civil Servants, the

Police and the CPS will concur with these

appalling travesties of legality, either by

being complicit in them themselves,

or else affording these powerful

and considerably influential but

loathsome perpetrators the

customary privilege

freely accorded to

them of blanket

immunity!

 

© Stanley V. Collymore

9 July 2014.

 

 

 

Author’s Observation:

 

In Britain the law is generally seen as an ass by Establishment figures and the privileged elites and therefore contemptuously treated as a needless inconvenience by them. Hardly surprising then that they conspiratorially and pertinaciously ensure that we have donkeys administering it.

 

By collymore.over-blog.com - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments

Présentation

  • : collymore.over-blog.com's name
  • collymore.over-blog.com's name
  • : Deals effectively and fearlessly with political issues, current affairs, poetry, short stories and general subject matter with a view to being informative.
  • Share this blog
  • Back to homepage
  • Contact

Créer un Blog

Recherche

Calendrier

July 2014
M T W T F S S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
<< < > >>
Create your blog for free on over-blog.com - Contact - Terms of Service - Earn Royalties - Report abuse - Most commented articles