Thursday 18 december 2014 4 18 /12 /Dec /2014 14:29


By Stanley Collymore



I know you want my body and I’m quite willing to give

it to you! For in the current circumstances it seems

to me to be the most desirable and natural thing

in the world for me to do, bearing in mind

the extensive manner in which you so

instinctively turn me on each time I look at

you, even when temporarily setting aside

the presence, I readily confess, of

that adorably enormous hard-on that

you’re nurturing, possess and delightfully

too evidently sporting; and itself quite

purposefully lurking within yet

conspicuously somewhat difficult

to conceal, I’m sure you’ll agree

with me, inside those rather

tight trousers of yours

that additionally and

quite temptingly

that you’re



Located in which is a Penis whose discernibly revealing

promise swiftly conjures up in my dizzy head through

these scrutinizing eyes of mine how very much

better that imposing and consummately

imploring erection of yours lovingly,

skilfully and appreciably set free

by someone like me from its

present, pointless and restrictive isolation could

alternatively, by merely operating externally

rather than being confined internally, be

more profitably, mutually beneficially,

enduringly and, decidedly, privately

recruited to assist – just by being

literally outdoors and effectively free –

the much needed catalyst, expectantly

and wholeheartedly wished for, to

expediently and pleasurably

liberate the coital bliss

profoundly yearned

for by yours



© Stanley V. Collymore

18 December 2014.




Author’s remarks:


True sexual liberation is not a one way street whose usage is or should ever be exclusively permitted or allowed to morph into becoming the sole prerogative of just one gender. Rather, it’s more of a dual carriageway where both participants should always be completely at liberty to openly express their specific sexual needs and preferences, hopefully be able to consensually fulfil them, or else have it honestly explained to them in a mature and sensitive way why their expectations can’t be realized. Anything else is sexual exploitation and should be sensibly avoided!


By - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Friday 12 december 2014 5 12 /12 /Dec /2014 14:02


By Stanley Collymore 


Are you absolutely sure that you’re really ready for this? Since,

to be perfectly honest with you, making love, as apart from

just gratuitously having sexual intercourse, can never

nor should it ever simply be considered as a

physical activity whose decidedly

consensual interaction among

likeminded persons involved ought by anyone

to be regarded as a legitimate subject liable

for external proscription, or only allowed

to be honourably indulged in, in what’s

deemed to be sensible moderation

that is itself completely free of

the evidently ridiculous but

also, would you credit

it, the contaminable

vice of excess?


Notwithstanding, and totally ignoring of course,

that what is being joyously, voluntarily and,

moreover, mutually and beneficially

engaged in is clearly what the

two adult participants - of

whatever race, social background or standing,

sexual orientation or gender they may be

and who are evidently committed to

each other in actions noticeably

and consistently shown to

be absolutely compos

mentis - are jointly,

undeniably and

always fully


of this.


In other words, and I sincerely hope you’ll

agree with me, that our sex life together,

were it ever to be assessed, is perfectly

reasonably, I firmly insist, strictly a

private matter between the two

of us that must permanently

remain our exclusive domain,

and isn’t nor should it either be

deemed or misguidedly

ever looked upon as

anybody else’s



© Stanley V. Collymore

11 December 2014.




Author’s Remarks:


Have you noticed as I’ve recurrently observed that those who are the most hopeless, inadequate and the least knowledgeable about or properly prepared in relation to having sex; those who frequently and most miserably fail to cope with the consequential effects of their own activities of what’s basically and quite inescapable a bodily function – whether indulged in unilaterally: you know what I mean, or consensually engaged in with someone else – and consequently envelop themselves with a multitude of ludicrous and self-indulgent, sexual hang-ups to conceal their failings, are the very ones who invariably think that they have the unchallengeable right to arbitrarily foist their pathetic, lame-brained, hypocritically induced and basically coercive indulgences onto others while at the same time self-importantly dictating to them how exactly they should conduct their own sexual lives.


Attitudes that instinctively prompt my advice to all these sanctimonious, particularly vainglorious and utterly disingenuous nerds, regardless of who they are or what influential or powerful roles they rather nepotistically hold in our society, to stick to minding their own bloody business, try chilling out instead, and as a personal favour to all intelligent and thinking members of our society to shut it and permanently get lost in the process!

By - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Monday 8 december 2014 1 08 /12 /Dec /2014 13:17


By Stanley Collymore



Please allow me, if may, to freely explain how

I personally feel about you romantically,

Helen and additionally what I’d

dearly love to favourably,

and also willingly, receive in return, as

well as permanently secure from the

continuance of this relationship:

newborn and admittedly in

its infancy, that you and

me are having.


That emotionally and physically I’m quite

emphatically taken with and, likewise,

am passionately in love with you

is an absolute certainty and,

moreover, a situation

that doesn’t demand nor remotely require

any convoluted explanations on my

part either for its existence or any

hoped for continuation; since for me

it’s an indelible state of affairs,

Helen that’s firmly and also

irreversibly, voluntarily

transfixed in my





Besides I’d love to marry and, significantly

too, spend the remainder of my life with

you - no wanton nor flippant pledge

that, I promise you, should you

decide and hopefully, from

my rather biased point

of view, graciously

consent, that is,

to effectively

have me.


And were that to happen I solemnly vow that in every

single one of my questingly benign endeavours to

literally do everything within my wit, power

and imagination to constantly make you

happy. Not simply because you had

elected to become my Darling

and most cherished wife,

but just as importantly

too had in the full and

incontestable knowledge regarding my

feelings for you, which I had freely

shared with you and that you’d

willingly accepted, I’d made

it unambiguously clear

that whatever else

in life I might

otherwise do, you dearest Helen

will forever, absolutely and

irreplaceably, remain

the most precious

person within

my life!


© Stanley V. Collymore

4 December 2014.




Author’s Remarks:



This poem: “Forever and committedly yours, Helen” was specifically written for and, as a result, is likewise dedicated to Helen whose family name is intentionally withheld by me to accord her the anonymity that she’s entitled to and which is quite rightfully hers; however the lady in question is perfectly well aware who the person mentioned in the poem is and crucially why she’s there; because Helen has been fully informed, even before the poem was physically created, of its impending conception.


Candidly, this poem is the author basically at his most benign, mischievously speaking, while specifically paying the ultimate in much deserved compliments to an undoubtedly prescient-minded lady who I’m absolutely certain will, with consummate humour, fully understand as well as completely and quite constructively take on board the undaunted intentions of this poem.


For the rest of you I earnestly hope that this poem will determinedly prompt a private odyssey: one involving the most intensive of explorations and ultimate discovery perhaps, in relation to your own sense and personal discernment of the deeply complex features surrounding the element of physical chemistry between diverse individuals; emotional feelings; intensive or otherwise individual experiences; and most especially so, love.


Attributes acutely pertinent in Britain’s case, it must be honestly stressed, where the noble art of wooing: the skill of  altruistically tendering genuine compliments and also intrinsically exhibiting conspicuously mutual high esteem between the two biological genders of male and female, has all but died out; and despairingly in their place the pernicious cynicism associated with only doing something merely to advantageously benefit one’s self socially, career-wise or otherwise materialistically from it, or even worst still instinctively choosing to look every gift horse in the mouth while robotically assuming that there’s a markedly hidden ulterior motive behind what are purely selfless actions, have become virtually endemic throughout the United Kingdom.


And the somewhat sickening irony of all this is, that those, across the entire spectrum of British society, who are the ones that quite bluntly would undoubtedly benefit the most from the badly needed and discernibly advisable implantation of these caring concepts, are precisely those who are the worst contributors themselves to this most appalling and ongoing state of affairs.

By - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Wednesday 3 december 2014 3 03 /12 /Dec /2014 15:01


By Stanley Collymore



On the 25th November 2014 the Metro newspaper of London, England emblazoned on its front-page the striking headline: “A nation of snoopers to fight terror.” Well, how relevant is that intentionally chilling statement to the lives of well-informed, compos mentis and objective Brits who can and do think for themselves, as apart from the uniformally gullible, intrinsically obsequious to their inbred supposed betters in class-ridden Britain; ferally disposed, and therefore easily manipulated kind that don’t, or are otherwise basically unable to? And how genuine, if at all, is this purported terror threat to the lives of the average Brit anyway?


Furthermore, should any country, and particularly one like Britain, that sanctimoniously and rather haughtily prides itself on freely adhering to all the well-known and cherished tenets of democracy, as it claims it does, be really obliged in the 21st Century to resort to the nefarious and utterly destructive Nazi and fascist policies universally practised throughout mainland Europe in the 1930s and 40s and moreover, well aware of what happened then, attendant with their deadly consequences? Progression not retrogression should be the byword of how a purported civilized nation actually, as distinct from delusively and self-delusionally, behaves; I think.


So here’s my take on the matter; since I’m neither impressed by government relentless spin nor the media’s abject spinelessness!


Germany, France, the other Baltic and Balkan states – most notably Croatia – in actual fact every other western European country and many other countries in Eastern Europe as well – infamously Poland and Ukraine – and even elements within the populations of the United Kingdom and also the Republic of Ireland, all had their own fascist, Nazi SS type and other individually state sanctioned at the very highest levels informers with all the attendant calamitous consequences that followed, as is perfectly well known to everyone who is neither totally brain-dead nor otherwise critically afflicted with convenient amnesia, of providing the human fodder as well as the hapless victims for Germany and indeed the rest of Europe’s iniquitous and rather alarmingly widespread density of World War II Konzentrationslager and death camps inmates; enthusiastic tasks which both in the lead up to World War II and furthermore throughout it as well, they mutually did their tasked work exceptionally well, and that’s principally why Europe’s holocaust was such a resounding success; death-wise anyway!


So Theresa May’s proposed snoopers’ charter is essentially neither unique nor innovative! Besides, she like the Prime Minister, David Cameron, their Cabinet colleagues and the Westminster club of MPs and peers who comprise the exceptionally wealthy, highly influential, markedly powerful and, as a result, the characteristically untouchable - most certainly so especially where our country’s law and order enforcement agencies are concerned - privileged toffs are in reality obviously no different in mindset from their erstwhile aristocratic and royal figures of the 1930s and 40s.


The likes, for example, of Edward Duke of Windsor and very much our present Queen’s biological uncle, who was given the unembellished ultimatum by Winston Churchill of either unconditionally accepting forthwith the governorship of the Atlantic British colony of Bermuda and thus getting the hell out of Europe where he was an especially close bosom pal of Adolf Hitler and the hierarchy of the German Nazi party – it must also not be forgotten that Edward always considered himself more German than British and said as much - or else find himself impeached for treason; namely plotting with the said Adolf Hitler and his inner circle of Nazis, of which Edward and his wife, the American Wallis Simpson, were unquestionably staunch and unswerving supporters, to recapture his erstwhile kingship by deposing, with Germany’s full backing, his brother George who’d replaced him as king after his evidently enforced abdication, and basically through appeasement on Edward’s part because of this deal with the Germans turn the UK and its empire into submissive vassal entities of the Third Reich.


Then there were Prince Philip’s sisters who were themselves very close buddies of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich’s upper hierarchal members while in addition married to senior ranking SS officers; acutely embarrassing situations that effectively debarred them from attending their brother, Philip’s marriage to the then Princess Elizabeth, the heiress to the British throne and ever since the death of her father George VI in 1952 our country’s monarch.


Princess Michael of Kent’s father was also a prominent SS officer, perceptibly imbuing her from all the available evidence to hand, with many of the unsavoury characteristics that she clearly portrays and which he evidently attached great importance to. And how can we ever forget Oswald Mosely: as aristocratic as one can possibly get; leader of the British Union of Fascists replete with his army of dedicated but utterly deluded thuggish Blackshirts; husband of Diana Mitford a committed Nazi and fascist herself and whose sister Unity, the aristocratic English socialite, was a devotee of Adolf Hitler who she met on several occasions and was also on very friendly terms with. So much then for the completely disingenuous notion, sanctimoniously propagated even to this day by this lying gang of British elites, that Britain and significantly themselves, as were their evil progenitors, morally and physically above the entrenched barbarities: notions as well as activities, of the mores of Nazism and fascism. Believe that if you’re stupid enough to do so, since nothing could be further from the truth!


So it wouldn’t in the least surprise me if Theresa May, with the avid support of the plethora of very likeminded Nazi legislators in both houses of the British parliament, successfully manages to get her snoopers’ charter on to our nation’s statute book.


For in that specific regard I honestly believe she will be pushing on an open door, very much attendant with the fact that the entrenched Nazi/fascist political DNA characteristic of herself, her political party, the Conservative Party’s coalition partners the Lib-Dems, the Labour Party’s recalcitrant Blairites, Ed Miliband’s coterie of endemically populist and opportunistic MPs constantly keen to say and do anything however unprincipled, lying or deeply immoral which would get them elected, and a significantly dumbed-down, intellectually challenged, and hugely apathetic public and electorate with a noticeably short US-type attention span, blissfully ignorant not only of contemporary European but also world affairs; additionally too either unknowingly or unthinkingly, individually and collectively unaware of the real source of them being cruelly conned, submissively find themselves manipulatively scared out of their wits by the completely tiresome but all the same recurrent profusion of fabricated stories about terrorist threats and plots deceitfully and copiously given the enlivening oxygen of publicity by the likes of Theresa May herself, the Prime Minister, the multifaceted state players like MI5, MI6 and others - all of them with their own personal agendas and vested interests uppermost in mind – and quite noticeably working dysfunctionally for most of the time with a perversely misleading and invariably outright lying media consisting of effectively brain-dead, jobsworth stenographers passing themselves off as journalists.


What’s more, given the haunting backdrop of Europe’s infamous track record in promoting and executing its self-centred, avariciously motivated and well established agenda of global chaos and terrorism to achieve its iniquitous ends, it very much looks that in realistic terms in relation to actually achieving her utterly dishonest objectives, Theresa May and her ilk are on to an implausible winner. I’ve explanatorily thoughtfully and rather deliberately used the term dishonest relative to Theresa May’s actions as well as her proposed plans. And here’s just one example of this.


Theresa May cites Boko Haram as a looming and imminent threat to Britain’s domestic security. That to be absolutely forthright is a bloody lie! For anyone who knows anything either sensible or relevant about the arbitrary creation by Britain of the disparate entity now called Nigeria would likewise be well aware of the origins of Boko Haram and its predecessor groups, and why it is that Boko Haram principally exists. And I can unchallengeably say that Boko Haram’s raison d’être has bugger all to do with threatening or assisting domestic terror in Britain of all places; and the contradictory assertion by Theresa May is effectively a premeditated and concerted lie for a start.


The perceived threat to Britain by Boko Haram, if one can logically or sensibly call it that, other than being fixated in the heads of Theresa May and her ilk is that the United Kingdom along with the rest of Europe, notably the EU countries and of course the United States, Canada and Australia, evidently desire once more to reactivate within the 21st Century the previous partitioning of Africa between the supposedly white Caucasian and principally European master race as they previously did - excluding then the US, Canada and of course Australia, as they were much too busy determinedly preoccupied with eradicating the indigenous peoples they found in the countries they brutally and savagely stole and to this day without any remorse or apology for their utterly loathsome actions still retain - at the Berlin Conference of 1884.


For once more the continent of Africa is not only perceived as but in reality is undoubtedly the richest one on Planet Earth and most particularly so in terms of its multiplicity of valuable natural resources that the infernally white west greedily wants again to have absolute control of Nigeria therefore is one of those African countries which is abundantly rich in oil and other valuable natural resources but regrettably like so many other African countries these aren’t shared equally, if at all, among its plainly diverse population; and the north of Nigeria, where Boko Haram originated and whose indigenous peoples are, as has always been the case ever since the creation of Nigeria by the British, been intentionally put upon by successive Nigerian regimes principally and historically controlled, with the complicit backing of Britain, by those in the south of the country, predominantly Christian as distinct from those in the north who were and are Muslim. And what has consistently been the case is the recurrent surfacing in Nigeria of a succession of corrupt and dictatorial regimes that have paid little or no regard to the genuine interests of their own population, and most especially those people living in the north of Nigeria.


Remarkably good news for successive British regimes and multinational corporations that between them and together with the objectionably, for the local Nigerian people, sycophantic compliance of the nauseating House Niggers that run the Nigeria and also overseer its peoples’ plight; a situation which effectively means that the entirely avaricious and ongoing financial interests of the City of London, the multinational corporations and the British elites can be catered for. And quite evidently British regimes, Cabinet ministers and the likes of Theresa May don’t want the status quo which is quite beneficial to these specific sectors in addition to their own personal financial empowerment by virtue of premeditated acts both on their part and that of others through public-service malfeasance, to be in any way endangered. And that’s essentially the real “threat” –one of the damaging exposure of these crooked, corrupt, criminal and feral specimens of humanity that run our country and that is the last thing they would want to see made public or desire for the British public to generally become aware of - that Boko Haram really poses to these absolutely venal bastards and their propagandistic bullhorns like Theresa May; but she’s not in any way going to regale you with the true facts of the matter, is she?


Therefore unless someone who knows the facts imparts this information to you or else you research it for yourselves you’ll continue to live in idyllic ignorance of what the real situation is while buying into the fabricated and vile narrative, which is precisely what they want you to do, that Theresa May and her loathsome gang of liars are readily supplying you with.


How many of you, for instance, know of the perfidious role that Vince Cable: a prominent member of the current Con-Dem British regime, has had and still continues to play in regards of Royal Dutch Shell? Not much, if anything at all, I would imagine? In which case, because it’s such an imperative matter, I suggest that you research this information online; there are a plethora of reputable sites that will not only amply provide you with Vince Cable’s role but also the way in which this multinational company has been methodically exploiting, as well as quite arrogantly and criminally behaving since the beginning of its drilling operations in Nigeria, towards the Nigerian people generally and those in the northern areas of Nigeria in particular where most of Royal Dutch Shell’s oil has been and is still extracted with all the deliberately uncaring and unapologetically innumerably inflicted problems of pollution and soil contamination by Royal Dutch Shell on the local landscape in addition to the daily destruction caused to the livelihoods and centuries-old traditional ways of going about their lives and everyday business by the wilfully marginalized indigenous peoples of these regions, and whose very existence Royal Dutch Shell has severely blighted, if not completely destroyed forever!


Therefore it’s in the overall interests of Theresa May, Vince Cable et al to see to it that the narrative which is spun out of 10 Downing Street is not only a fraudulent one but also one that will effectively paint Boko Harem in as dreadful a light as is possible; for were that not to happen and all Nigerians, exclusive, of course, of those corrupt House Niggers wholeheartedly sycophantic to the interests of the west, to essentially benefit from genuine societal empowerment that was derived from their own natural resources, that naturally wouldn’t go down at all well with the tremendously privileged white ruling elites: politicians as well as those who run their paymaster multinational corporations in the west.


So as is the norm with whites when they wish to dispose of or justify their crude antipathy towards those whom they conspiratorially regard as Uppity Niggers that must be passionately vilified or else destroyed - regardless of how moral and legitimate the victims’ cause is – it all starts with character assassination, whether it’s Michael Brown, Mark Duggan or Boko Haram. And that’s precisely why Theresa May has quite bizarrely thrown Boko Haram into her UK domestic, terrorist in-tray. While in reality if one were to give this distinctly vicious woman a noticeably unmarked map of the globe with no references to any place on it and ask her to point out exactly where Nigeria was, this stupid bitch quite simply wouldn’t have a clue! Which prompts the obvious and rather pertinent question. How can anyone be your mortal enemy as you stridently and unconvincingly assert when in reality you really know fuck all about them?


Makes no goddam sense to me, I must confess. But who ever said that fucking ignoramuses among British government ministers of any political colour were ever rational? And why should they bother in the least to even pretend that they are when they clearly have brain-dead cunts like you to believe their every dishonest, fabricated and lying word?


One Brit that clearly doesn’t belong to this category of cretins however is Chris Irvine, a councillor in Rochester Kent who, in response to Theresa May’s ludicrous shenanigans, had this to say: “I grew up in Northern Ireland during the worst of the Troubles and never witnessed anything [so] remotely resembling this level of scaremongering. We have to take the terror threat seriously but I don’t see how striking the fear of God into everyone helps.” Incidentally, have you actually noticed like I have that even enlightened white individuals like this councillor from Kent still can’t bring themselves to even admit let alone openly and honestly say that what went on in Northen Ireland, and is still doing so to this day, is a bloody civil war; anywhere else, for example in the so-called developing world or countries that Britain and the rest of the west don’t like, it would instantaneously be characterized as such.


Anyway to what councillor Chris Irvine has said I shall bluntly add this - Britain and its complement of criminal cohorts should get the fuck out of other peoples’ countries and stop causing mayhem and murder there for their own selfish, self-centred and venal interests! In short, leave these people alone and in peace to live their lives as they choose to and not as the west dictates, bearing in mind it’s the same west that quite hypocritically, and with no shortage of double standards to boost that, arrogates to itself the fundamental right to do the same in respect of how it conducts its international and most especially so its domestic affairs. Can’t say fairer than that! Besides, it’s not rocket science that if the west carries on gratuitously killing people in their own countries as it habitually does that blowback will be the inevitable result from those who survived those onslaughts, as well as their own kith and kin in acts of justifiable revenge wherever they may be in the world, and that includes the countries that are perpetrating these grotesque evils.


And if white run and stolen Australia, not in the least threatened by anyone, can wilfully wage wars, in of all places the Middle East, on the purposeful behalf only of its white kith and kin in Britain, the US and elsewhere, why the hell then shouldn’t others adopt the same attitude in reverse towards our distinctly white barbarian hordes?

By - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments
Saturday 29 november 2014 6 29 /11 /Nov /2014 12:08



By Stanley Collymore



You persistently gave much needed succour to my

forbearers in their hour of need; and throughout

the painfully long, trying and devastating

calamities they were routinely and

inhumanly subjected to you

were always there.


Just as you provided the inspiration for the

endeavours of my grandparents and

parents’ generations, as well as

my own, to combat and

rise above the feral

propensity of the albino Caucasian hordes

who intuitively, though ludicrously by

virtue of their barbarity, convinced

themselves then and even to this

day still believe against all

rational judgement that they

are racially superior in every

way to the Black sons and

daughters that you gave

rise to, nurtured and

consistently have

empowered to

forever stand

their ground

and never

ever run



We’ve learnt those lessons well! Are hugely proud

of what you’ve already done and intentionally,

regardless of the circumstances, will carry

on doing, wherever we are, for all of

us; and as faithful sons and loyal

daughters all do joyfully and

indefatigably reassert our

enduring love, absolute

and unquestioning

loyalty and utter commitment to

you our truthfully blessed,

beloved and profoundly

inspiring homeland

that is Barbados!


© Stanley V. Collymore

18 November 2014.




A Progenitorial Tribute:



On the 30th November 2014 Barbados celebrates 48 years as a durably stable, democratic, immensely well-educated – the country has a truly impressive 100% adult literacy rate, which is recurrently confirmed by UNESCO and, as a result, proudly puts it among the top five nations globally in this educational stratosphere of the truly excellent.


Education in Barbados is statutorily but welcomingly by all Bajans compulsorily universal as well as absolutely and legally free – namely that it’s fully state funded at all levels from all pre-school stages, including kindergarten, to higher educational and postgraduate university studies by consensual parliamentary agreement as well as every Barbadian government that assumes power – regardless of its general and overall political ideology - to all those who are of Barbadian heritage and residing on the island, irrespective of where in the world they were born or actually grew up.


Significantly, too, with a phenomenal and comprehensively universal health care system that’s likewise funded by the state at the behest of the government in office and completely free to all those in need of its services at the point of entry and throughout their lifetime, Barbados is truly blessed with an enormously healthy population across the board of its inhabitants, and along with Cuba and Japan proudly boasts among its physically fit and mentally active populace the encouraging and noble distinction of having in its midst the greatest living and ongoing number of centenarians anywhere in the world. Crucially as well the average life expectancy relative to Barbadians of both genders is an impressive 77 years.


And quite interestingly for a country that’s only 21 miles long and 14 and a half miles wide and with a domestic population of 280,000 souls residing there, Barbados in terms of its national GDP measurement ranks among the top 50 wealthiest nations in the world.


Characteristically a nation of very prudent, economic-wise and exceptionally thrifty people who continue, as they’ve always historically done, to live well within their financial means, Barbados’ exalted and global economic status doesn’t in the least surprise any Bajan of either gender or, for that matter, the equally enlightened outsider who is fully cognisant of Barbados’ overall history.


For it was Barbados’ money derived from sugar, molasses and rum created by enslaved Black Barbadian labour and of which England – there was no United Kingdom then as the union with Scotland hadn’t even been conceived let alone brought to fruition – had an absolute global monopoly that made England the prominent country it became and put the Great in Britain. Since Barbados was its most valuable colony that funded the English Industrial Revolution as well as other significant financial, political and social developments in this previously off-shore European backwater called England.


A state of affairs that remarkably catapulted England, and subsequently what would become the United Kingdom, into the global superpower and empire that both jointly became, and remained so until their demise in the middle and latter halves of the 20th Century. A period of time, too, at the outset when Barbados wasn’t only England and the UK’s most prized asset but also their wealthiest colony!


And therefore against that enthralling and memorable backdrop, and additionally for all the many other wonderful things that you’ve done over the years and still carry on doing for your eternally grateful sons and daughters, this immensely proud and hugely thankful Bajan son of yours most wholeheartedly wish you the heartiest of congratulations on the attainment and commemoration of the 48th anniversary year of your independence concomitant with your richly deserved status as a sovereign state, attendant with all the conceivable best wishes, in every regard, for your future. Most steadfastly, perpetually and loyally yours Stanley V. Collymore.


By - Community: News, Social Commentary, Creative Writing, Poetry & Politics
Enter comment - View the 0 comments


  • :'s name
  •'s name
  • : Deals effectively and fearlessly with political issues, current affairs, poetry, short stories and general subject matter with a view to being informative.
  • Share this blog
  • Back to homepage
  • Contact

Créer un Blog


December 2014
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        
<< < > >>
Create your blog for free on - Contact - Terms of Service - Earn Royalties - Report abuse - Most commented articles